Filter by Date

For the Latest Updates, Please Join Our Channel 

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ANIL KALRA Vs. J.D.PANDEY & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 3763 of 2007, Judgment Date: Sep 29, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL BHALKI, KARNATAKA Vs. GURAPPA(D) BY LRS & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 8044-8048 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 29, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

ESSAR TELEHOLDINGS LTD Vs. CBI

Appeal (Crl.), 1273 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 29, 2015

In the end I may add that it is not obligatory on the Court to hold a joint trial and provisions of these sections are only enabling provisions. An accused cannot insist with ulterior purpose or otherwise that he be tried as co-accused with other accused, that too in a different case. It is only a discretionary power and Court may Full Judgment

Tags Corruption
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ANIL KALRA Vs. J.D.PANDEY & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 3763 of 2007, Judgment Date: Sep 29, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

NEERU YADAV Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ANR.

Appeal (Crl.), 1272 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 29, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Bail
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. RAMLAL DEVAPPA RATHOD & ORS

Appeal (Crl.), 1957 of 2008, Judgment Date: Sep 29, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF U.P. Vs. RAGHUNANDAN @ BADE MALI & ORS.

Appeal (Crl.), 1189 of 2008, Judgment Date: Sep 29, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. RAMLAL DEVAPPA RATHOD & ORS

Appeal (Crl.), 1957 of 2008, Judgment Date: Sep 29, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

NARENDER SINGH & ORS. Vs. STATE OF M.P.

Appeal (Crl.), 2110 of 2009, Judgment Date: Sep 29, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

CHINTAMAN NAMDEV PATIL (DEAD) Vs. SUKHDEV NAMDEV PATIL & ANR

Appeal (Civil), 1991 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 28, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DELHI DIOCESAN TRUST ASSOCIATION Vs. ASHWANI KUMAR

Appeal (Civil), 8008 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 28, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SAMAR PAL SINGH Vs. CHITRANJAN SINGH

Appeal (Civil), 7988 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 28, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

U.O.I & ANR Vs. M.P TRADING & INVESTMENT RAC. CORP. LTD

Appeal (Civil), 8077-8079 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 28, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India

MUKHTAR KHAN & ORS Vs. STATE OF CHATTISGARH & ANR

Appeal (Crl.), 1280 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 28, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

HARYANA WAKF BOARD Vs. RAJENDER KUMAR

Appeal (Civil), 8018 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 28, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAM HARI MHATRE Vs. MAHADEO BALU MHATRE & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 7984 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

GURMINDER SINGH Vs. AMARJIT KAUR & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 8085 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

JAI MAHAL HOTELS PVT. LTD. Vs. RAJKUMAR DEVRAJ & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 7914 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 23, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SHARADAMMA Vs. MOHAMMED PYREJAN(D) TR.LRS.& ANR

Appeal (Civil), 7889 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 23, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. PRAKASH @ GAJENDRA

Appeal (Crl.), 1246 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 23, 2015

Simpliciter, it has been observed that a careful scrutiny of the entire evidence has been made but we find from the judgment that no such exercise has been done. Mere statement in the judgment to that effect is not enough. Evidence is not only required to be mentioned in the judgment but its evidentiary value has to be assessed carefully. Full Judgment