Judgments - Supreme Court of India
MANGT. OF NARENDRA & CO. PVT. LTD. Vs. WORKMEN OF NARENDRA & CO.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Full Judgment
SAMEERA PAIKARA Vs. AMIT AJIT JOGI( AMIT AISHWARYA JOGI) & ORS.
MOHDINSA NABISA GURIKAR (D) BY LRS Vs. IMAMSA CHANDAS GURIKAR (D) BY LRS & ORS.
M/S. S.K.L. CO. Vs. CHIEF COMMERCIAL OFFICER & ORS.
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA Vs. VIRUDHUNAGAR STEEL ROLLING MILLS LTD&ORS
LIC OF INDIA Vs. INSURE POLICY PLUS SERVICES PVT.LTD.&ORS
THE KERALA BAR HOTELS ASSOCIATION & ANR. Vs. STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.
PRAMOD Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
PEGASUS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION P.LTD. Vs. M/S HARYANA CONCAST LIMITED & ANR
K.B. RAMACHANDRA RAJ URS(D) BY LRS. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES-ON-RECORD ASSOCIATION AND ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. HEMANT KAWADU CHAURIWAL ETC
It is a settled law that dying declaration can be the sole basis of conviction and it does not require any corroboration. But it is equally true that dying declaration goes against the cardinal principle of law that 'evidence must be direct'. Thus, dying declaration must be judged and appreciated in light of the surrounding circumstances Full Judgment
ADI SAIVA SIVACHARIYARGAL N.SANGAM &ORS. Vs. GOVT. OF TAMIL NADU & ANR.
SHREYA VIDYARTHI Vs. ASHOK VIDYARTHI & ORS.
RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Vs. JAYANTILAL N. MISTRY
PREM NATH BALI Vs. REG.,HIGH COURT OF DELHI & ANR.
It is a settled principle of law that once the charges leveled against the delinquent employee are proved then it is for the appointing authority to decide as to what punishment should be imposed on the delinquent employee as per the Rules. The appointing authority, keeping in view the Full Judgment
