Supreme Court of India
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 377 OF 2009
Judgment Date: Feb 24, 2009
The mere recovery by itself cannot prove the charge of the prosecution against the accused, in the absence of any evidence to prove payment of bribe or to show the accused voluntarily accepted the money knowing it to be bribe.
that it is not enough that some currency notes were handed over to the public servant to make it acceptance of gratification and prosecution has a further duty to prove that what was paid amounted to gratification,
19. It is well settled Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2045
of 2008, Judgment Date: Dec 16, 2008
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 6582
of 2008, Judgment Date: Nov 07, 2008
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3907
of 2007, Judgment Date: Aug 24, 2008
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 5597
of 2001, Judgment Date: May 16, 2008
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), ----
of 2008, Judgment Date: May 13, 2008
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3500
of 2008, Judgment Date: May 12, 2008
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 518
of 2006, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2008
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1800
of 2007, Judgment Date: Dec 15, 2007
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2060
of 2007, Judgment Date: Apr 19, 2007
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 520
of 2007, Judgment Date: Apr 10, 2007
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 151
of 2004, Judgment Date: Mar 26, 2007
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 853
of 2006, Judgment Date: Feb 15, 2007
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 5779
of 2006, Judgment Date: Dec 13, 2006
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 5603
of 2006, Judgment Date: Dec 05, 2006
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Transfer Petition (Civil), 000228-000228
of 2004, Judgment Date: Nov 20, 2006
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench- Five Judge)
Writ Petition (Civil), 61
of 2002, Judgment Date: Oct 19, 2006
CONCLUSION:
The impugned constitutional amendments by which
Articles 16(4A) and 16(4B) have been inserted flow from
Article 16(4). They do not alter the structure of Article
16(4). They retain the controlling factors or the
compelling reasons, namely, backwardness and
inadequacy of representation which enables the States to
provide for reservation keeping in mind the overall
efficiency of the State administration under Article 335.
These impugned amendments are confined only to Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1012
of 1999, Judgment Date: Jul 04, 2006
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 000812-000812
of 2004, Judgment Date: Mar 21, 2006
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1687
of 2006, Judgment Date: Mar 21, 2006
Full Judgment
