Judgments of Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SARAL WIRE CRAFT PVT. LTD. Vs. COMMISSIONER CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX, & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 5631-5632 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 20, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S SARAL WIRE CRAFT PVT. LTD. Vs. COMMISSIONER CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX, & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 5631-5632 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 20, 2015

Tags Tax/ Tax Settlement, Excise Duty

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

POONAIYAH RAMAJAYAM INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TRUST Vs. MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR

Appeal (Civil), 14838 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 15, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF M.P. Vs. MAHARANI USHADEVI

Appeal (Civil), 557-558 of 2012, Judgment Date: Jul 15, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAVINDER SINGH Vs. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

Appeal (Crl.), 931 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 15, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

P.A.JOSE ETC. Vs. COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, KOTTAYAM ETC

Appeal (Civil), 5489-90 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 15, 2015

Tags Tax/ Tax Settlement, Excise Duty

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

JOGENDRA YADAV & ORS. Vs. STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 343 of 2012, Judgment Date: Jul 15, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KIRPAL KAUR Vs. JITENDER PAL SINGH & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2820 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 14, 2015

Tags CPC

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

VIJAY MALLYA Vs. ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE,MIN.OF FINANCE.

Appeal (Crl.), 1406 of 2009, Judgment Date: Jul 13, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors Vs Anand Mohan & Anr

Appeal (Civil), 1971 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 09, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

OM PRAKASH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Appeal (Crl.), 1112 of 2011, Judgment Date: Jul 09, 2015

Tags Murder

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

F.C.I. Vs. SANKAR GHOSH & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 5079 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 08, 2015

Tags Regularisation

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

NANDKISHORE LALBHAI MEHTA Vs. NEW ERA FABRICS P.LTD.& ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 1148 of 2010, Judgment Date: Jul 08, 2015

Tags Decree

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RIJU PRASAD SARMA ETC.ETC. Vs. STATE OF ASSAM & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 3276-3278 of 2013, Judgment Date: Jul 07, 2015

Tags Land Acquisition

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S BHS INDUSTRIES Vs. EXPORT CREDIT GUARANTEE CORP.& ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 2729 of 2009, Judgment Date: Jul 07, 2015

Tags Consumer

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

CHANDRA BABU @ MOSES Vs. STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE & ORS.

Appeal (Crl.), 866 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 07, 2015

Tags Investigation

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ABC Vs. STATE(NCT OF DELHI)

Appeal (Civil), 28367 of 2011, Judgment Date: Jul 06, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

JOGENDRASINHGJI VIKAYSINHJI Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 2374 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 06, 2015

In view of the aforesaid analysis, we proceed to summarise our conclusions as follows:- (A) Whether a letters patent appeal would lie against the order passed by the learned Single Judge that has travelled to him from the other tribunals or authorities, would depend upon many a facet. The Court fee payable on a petition to make it under Article 226 or Article 227 or both, would depend upon Full Judgment

Tags Jurisdiction

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MAINUDDIN ABDUL SATTAR SHAIKH Vs. VIJAY D SAVLI

Appeal (Crl.), 1472 of 2009, Judgment Date: Jul 06, 2015

Tags Dishonour Of Cheque

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SIRAJUL & ORS. Vs. THE STATE OF U.P. & ANR

Appeal (Crl.), 854 of 2011, Judgment Date: Jul 06, 2015

24. It is, therefore, well settled that the right to speedy trial in all criminal persecutions (sic prosecutions) is an inalienable right under Article 21 of the Constitution. This right is applicable not only to the actual proceedings in court but also includes within its sweep the preceding police investigations as well. The right to speedy trial extends equally Full Judgment

Tags Quashing Of Criminal Proceedings