Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4542
of 2007, Judgment Date: Apr 29, 2015
The question raised before us is whether the respondent-Revenue could
resile from a settlement entered into with the assessee on the basis of
which the appellant has already paid and settled his dues under the Act.
“In a Taxing Act one has to look merely at what is clearly said. There is
no room for any intendment. There is no equity about a tax. There Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4043
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
it is
the prerogative of the Creditor alone whether he would move against the
principal debtor first or the surety, to realize the loan amount.
“Therefore, the creditor has a right to obtain a decree against the surety
and the principal debtor. The surety has no right to restrain execution of
the decree against him until the creditor has exhausted his remedy against
the principal debtor Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 728
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 728
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2180
of 2009, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 181
of 2013, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2174
of 2009, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1647-1648
of 2008, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 709
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 707
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 707
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
707
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 637
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 27, 2015
We are called upon in
this appeal to decide whether the 4th respondent was authorised to
represent the case of the prosecution in the High Court of Karnataka in the
appeals filed by the accused persons against their conviction by the
Special Court, and if he was not so authorised, whether Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
722
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 27, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2047
of 2008, Judgment Date: Apr 24, 2015
Dealing with the
concept of chance witness, a two-Judge Bench in Rana Pratap and others v.
State of Haryana[8], has observed that:-
“We do not understand the expression “chance witnesses”. Murders are
not committed with previous notice to witnesses, soliciting their
presence. If murder is committed in a dwelling house, the inmates Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 4367
of 2004, Judgment Date: Apr 24, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 9799
of 2010, Judgment Date: Apr 24, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 714
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 24, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 5511 - 5512
of 2014, Judgment Date: Apr 24, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3912
of 2015, Judgment Date: Apr 24, 2015
Full Judgment
