Judgments - Supreme Court of India
JITENDRA KHIMSHANKAR TRIVEDI & ORS. Vs. KASAM DAUD KUMBHAR & ORS.
Even assuming Jayvantiben Jitendra Trivedi was not self- employed doing embroidery and tailoring work, the fact remains that she was a housewife and a home maker. It is hard to monetize the domestic work done by a house-mother. The services of the mother/wife is available 24 hours and her duties are never fixed. Courts have Full Judgment
INDIAN BANK Vs. MANILAL GOVINDJI KHONA
The issue raised by the respondent in the present case strikes at the very authority of the High Court in permitting the Court Receiver by its order dated 3.12.1999 to auction the mortgaged property of the respondent in public auction pursuant to the decree passed by the High Court in favour of the appellant-Bank. The above said important aspect of the case Full Judgment
SARVESH BANSAL & ANR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Oshiar Prasad and Others VERSUS The Employers in relation to Management of Sudamdih Coal Washery of M/s BCCL, Dhanbad, Jharkhand
BALU S/O ONKAR PUND & ORS. Vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICER Vs. SYED ABDUL SALEEM & ORS.
Ajay Ramdas Ramteke and Anr. Versus Mahanagar Sudhar Samiti, Akola & Ors.
SAHOO BABA (D) TR.LRS.& ANR Vs. HARYANA URBAN DEVL.AUTH.& ANR
M.V.JAYARAJAN Vs. HIGH COURT OF KERALA & ANR.
CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSCN. OF INDIA & ORS Vs. TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHY.OF INDIA & ORS.
MOUNT MARY ENTERPRISES Vs. M/S.JIVRATNA MEDI TREAT PVT LTD
C SUKUMARAN Vs. STATE OF KERALA
It has been continuously held by this Court in a catena of cases after interpretation of the provisions of Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Act that the demand of illegal gratification by the accused is the sine qua non for constituting an offence under the provisions of the Act. In the present case, as has been rightly held by the High Court, there Full Judgment