Judgments - Supreme Court of India
Smt. Rashmi Kumar vs Mahesh Kumar Bhada
SMT. YALLAWWA VS. SMT. SHANTAVVA
Union Of India And Anr vs Ashok Kumar Mitra
KUMARI MADHURI PATIL Vs. ADDL. COMMISSIONER
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH VS. BABUL NATH
ACTION COMMITTEE Vs. UNION OF INDIA
AJAY AGARWAL Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Babu Lal Bajpai Vs State Of U.P.
there was no motive for demanding and accepting the bribe because no bill was pending before him for pre-audit. Secondly, there was no independent witness examined although it was possible for the prosecution to secure one to witness the actual transaction. The only witness who could be said to be independent was the Executive Magistrate who was asked by the District Magistrate to accompany the raiding party for laying the trap. Even this witness, in his deposition, has failed to support Full Judgment
Payal Jindal (Mrs) Vs. A.K. Jindal
Ranjit Kumar Ghosh And Another vs Sirish Chandra Bose And Others
K. VEERASWAMI Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Smt. Sureshta Devi vs Om Prakash
SMT. ISABELLA JOHNSON vs. M.A. SUSAI
Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao vs Dean, Seth G.S. Medical College
P.L. Shah vs Union Of India & Anr
RAM NARAIN GUPTA Vs. SMT. RAMESHWARI GUPTA
G.V.NanjundiahVs State (Delhi Administration)
The question as to the handing-over of any bribe and recovery of the same from the accused should be considered along with other material circumstances one of which is the question whether any demand was at all made by the appellant for the bribe. When it is found that no such demand was made by the accused and the prosecution has given a false story in that regard, the Court will view the allegation of payment of the bribe to Full Judgment