Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 697
of 2011, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
It is further well established that where misconduct is proved, the
alleged enmity between the complainant and the delinquent officer is
immaterial. (See B. Hanumantha Rao v. State of A.P.[4]).
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 730
Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1035
of 2008, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 623-24
of 2008, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1611
of 2009, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2096-98
of 2009, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
In the light of the eye witness account and the post mortem report it
is quite clear that the respondents were present when Tikaram was burning
alive. The sequence of narration certainly shows that they were waiting in
ambush. It may be that only two of them set Tikaram afire but the others
definitely ensured by surrounding Tikaram that he would not be allowed to
escape. Further, throwing of burning Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1506
of 2009, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
It is settled principle that a conviction can well be founded on
the testimony of a single witness if the court finds his version to be
trustworthy and corroborated by record on material particulars[1].
We are conscious that we are considering an appeal against
acquittal and that going by the law laid down by this Court, the Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1743
of 2009, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
The language used as a means of communication between the
confessing accused and the recording officer being Hindi or
Hindustani, such recording of confession in Hindi language is
completely in conformity with the Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 623-24
of 2008, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1611
of 2009, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 836
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
WRIT - C, 25226
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10643-10644
of 2010, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2096-2098
of 2009, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 731
of 2007, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1611
of 2009, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
WRIT - C, 33392
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
FA->FIRST APPEAL, 77
of 2009, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
MAC->MISC.APPEAL OF COPENSATION, 193,219
of 2008, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 5070
of 2008, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015
Full Judgment
