Filter by Date

For the Latest Updates, Please Join Our Channel 

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Nand Kumar Sahu Nand Kumar Sahu Vs Satyanarayan Sharma

EP->ELECTION PETITION, 13 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 12, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Election
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

HC PRADEEP KUMAR RAI & ORS. Vs. DINESH KUMAR PANDEY & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6549 of 2014, Judgment Date: May 11, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. SRI CHAND

Appeal (Crl.), 561 of 2009, Judgment Date: May 11, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MOHAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASHTAN

Appeal (Crl.), 758 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 11, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Sentence
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

THE CHAIRMAN & MNG.DIR., TNHB & ANR. Vs. S. SARASWATHY & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 736-737 of 2008, Judgment Date: May 11, 2015

Full Judgment

Karnataka High Court (Single Judge)

SELVI J. JAYALALITHA Vs STATE, BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI-CORRUPTION SPECIAL INVESTIGATION CELL CHENNAI

Criminal Appeal, 835 of 2014, Judgment Date: May 11, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Corruption
Allahabad High Court (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

State Of U.P. Through Principal Secy. And Others Vs. Rajendra Singh And Another

726 of 1987, Judgment Date: May 11, 2015

Full Judgment

(Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

State Of U.P. Through Principal Secy. And Others Vs. Rajendra Singh And Another

726 of 1997, Judgment Date: May 11, 2015

Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Devraj Gupta Vs State of Chhattisgarh

WP->WRIT PETITION, 5827 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 11, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs. HANUMAN INDUSTRIES & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 3962 of 2011, Judgment Date: May 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SANJEEV KUMAR GUPTA Vs. STATE OF U.P.(NOW UTTARAKHAND)

Appeal (Crl.), 508 of 2013, Judgment Date: May 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

PURUSHOTTAM DASHRATH BORATE & ANR. Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

AA, 1439 of 2013, Judgment Date: May 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Smt. Mamta Rai Vs. State Of U.P. & 8 Others

WRIT - A, 1416 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 08, 2015

Once it has been found that Indra Dev had no right over the property in question, obviously his heirs also had no right, based upon inheritence, to transfer the same. There is no error of jurisdiction or failure of justice in the matter, which may require any interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition fails and is dismissed. Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

M/s Mile Stone Soft. Tech. Pvt. Ltd. Vs Nidhi Chhibber

CONC->CONTEMPT CASE, 02 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. SERVO-MED INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI

Appeal (Civil), 583 of 2005, Judgment Date: May 07, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

KHENYEI Vs. NEW INDIA ASSURNACE CO.LTD.& ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4244 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 07, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, KERALA Vs. M/S. TRAVANCORE SUGARS & CHEMICALS LTD.

Appeal (Civil), 2558 of 2005, Judgment Date: May 07, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Ashish Kumar And Another Vs. State Of U.P. And Another

APPLICATION U/s 482, 12482 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 07, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

IQBAL & ANR Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Appeal (Crl.), 1663 of 2012, Judgment Date: May 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF A.P. Vs. P.VENKATESHWARLU

Appeal (Crl.), 1317 of 2008, Judgment Date: May 06, 2015

The demand and acceptance of the amount as illegal gratification is a sine qua non for constituting an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The prosecution is duty bound to establish that there was illegal offer of bribe and acceptance thereof and it has to be founded on facts. The offence under Section 7 of P.C. Act has been confirmed by the Full Judgment