Latest Judgments of Supreme Court of India and M.P High Court.

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

NAGRAJ Vs. STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T.N.

Appeal (Crl.), 1311 of 2006, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

D. VELAYUTHAM Vs. STATE REP.BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Appeal (Crl.), 787 of 2011, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

He has admitted the receipt of the bribe amount. The only effort at proving his innocence has been the submission that receipt of the entire sum was on behalf of Accused 1, no part of which was demanded by Accused 2 for his own keeping and consumption. This Court has ratiocinated in significant length and detail on the nature of evidence commonly encountered in trap cases Full Judgment

Tags Corruption PC Act Conviction Evidence Circumstantial Evidence Trap Case

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BHARGAVA & ASSOCIATES PVT.LTD.& ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 5099 of 2008, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DEEPAK Vs. STATE OF HARYANA

Appeal (Crl.), 65 of 2012, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

JIBAN KRISHNA MONDAL & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6373 of 2010, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ARUNBHAI KALYANBHAI SUTARIYA Vs. NUTAN NAGRIK SAHAKARI BANK LTD.& ANR

Appeal (Civil), 2822 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

V.KRISHNASWAMY & ANR. Vs. KARNATAKA RAJYA KAIGARIKA SAHAKARI &ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 2874 - 75 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MOHAMMED HUSSAIN WAREKAR Vs. U.O.I. & ORS.

Writ Petition (Civil), 37 of 2013, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ST.MARY'S HOTEL(P) LTD.& ANR Vs. KOTTAYAM DIST.COOP.BANK LTD.& ORS.

Writ Petition (Civil), 367 of 2011, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Bedanti Tiwari Vs Bhaiyalal Rajwade and others

ACQA->ACQUITTAL APPEAL [ APPEAL U/S 378 ], 01 of 2014 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Raghunath Sharan Agnihotri Vs Girish Chandra Yadav & Another

MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227, 1341 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Dr. Laxmi Nath Misra Vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy.,Ayush Anubhag-2 & Anr.

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, 197 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S Maa Vindhyavasini Construction Thru. Partner Vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Rural Development & 5 Ors.

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, 583 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Allahabad High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Rajendra Singh Vs State Of U.P. & 2 Others

WRIT - C, 11489 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ANIL JOSHI & ORS. Vs. STATE OF H.P.& ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6097-6100 of 2009, Judgment Date: Mar 09, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

U.O.I & ORS Vs. GURDAYAL SINGH

Appeal (Civil), 2865-2866 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 09, 2015

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

A.K. Construction Company Vs State of Madhya Pradesh and Others

ACQA->ACQUITTAL APPEAL [ APPEAL U/S 378 ], 1533 of 2000 ,1530 of 2000 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 09, 2015

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Smt. Chhaya Roy W/o Durga Shankar Roy, aged about 58 years, R/o Satipara Ambikapur, P.S. City Kotwali & P.O. Ambikapur, Civil & Revenue District - Ambikapur (C.G.) 2. Shri Durga Shankar Roy S/o Late Prabhakar Roy, aged about 69 Years, R/o Satipara Amb

ACQA->ACQUITTAL APPEAL [ APPEAL U/S 378 ], 218 of 2014 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 09, 2015

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Vijay Dewangan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

ACQA->ACQUITTAL APPEAL [ APPEAL U/S 378 ], 83 of 2015 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 04, 2015

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Vs. RAM PAL

Appeal (Crl.), 393 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 27, 2015

Only question raised for consideration is whether the sentence imposed in the facts and circumstances is fair and just. Moreover, in an appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution, this Court does not re-appreciate the evidence, in absence of perversity or patent legal error, merely because a different view was also possible. We are thus, not inclined to reopen Full Judgment

Tags Accident Claims Compensation Compensation Enhanced Conviction Sentence