Judgments
Suneel Prakash Sharma & Others Vs. Vivek Kumar Ruthiya & Another
Law laid down - Held: The power under Order XXVI Rule 9 of CPC for appointment of Commissioner can also be exercised in order to ascertain the correct factual position, if the same is not ascertainable on the basis of the oral and documentary evidence. Full Judgment
Manoj Parmar vs. Union of India and others
Law laid down - Held: 1. Section 407 of Cr.P.C. is an assurance of fair trial. 2. A litigant cannot choose a Bench of his choice. It is only an exceptional circumstances, where the existence of “bias” or “likelihood of bias” when apparent on the facts and circumstances of the case, the High Court can invoke its discretionary power under Section 407 of Cr.P.C. In the absence of an allegation of “pre-existing bias”, the power of transfer of a case should normally Full Judgment
Smt. Pushpa Sen vs. Manoj Sen
Law laid down - Held : Appellant-wife filed a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955 for restitution of conjugal rights after filing three different proceedings against the respondent-husband and his relatives. It cannot be said that the respondent-husband has withdrawn the company of appellant-wife without any reasonable excuse and, hence, no decree under section 9 of the Act can be granted. Full Judgment
Roshan and others Vs The State of Madhya Pradesh
PANI RAM VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
MADHYA PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Versus Manish Bakawale & Ors.
Govindan vs. STATE REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
BRIGADE ENTERPRISES LIMITED Versus ANIL KUMAR VIRMANI & ORS.
BRIJMANI DEVI VERSUS PAPPU KUMAR & ANR.
Ravinder Kumar Dhariwal & Anr. Versus The Union of India & Ors.
NGAITLANG DHAR VERSUS PANNA PRAGATI INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.
Rajesh Pravinchandra Rajyaguru Versus Gujarat Water Supply & Sewerage Board and Ors.
Ram Ratan Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
PARVATI DEVI VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR NOW STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.
SUNNY ABRAHAM VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
K. Anjinappa Versus K.C. Krishna Reddy and Anr.
MANMOHAN NAGAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
This miscellaneous application is filed in a disposed of special leave petition. The grievance made is that as per the liberty given by this Court vide order dated 15.12.2021, the petitioners-applicants moved the High Court for urgent relief. However, the High Court opined that since the main matter is already listed in the first week of January, 2022, the entire matter can be considered at that time. We are not going into the correctness of that submission. The fact remains that the elections Full Judgment