Judgments
M/S BHUSHAN PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. VERSUS NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR.
HIMACHAL PRADESH HORTICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING AND PROCESSING CORPORATION LIMITED VERSUS MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION
PANKAJ GOYAL @PANKAJ KUMAR GOYAL @BITTOO VERSUS STATE OF NCT DELHI
BHIMRAO RAMCHANDRA KHALATE (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS. VERSUS NANA DINKAR YADAV (TANPURA) & ANR.
KRISHNA GOPAL TIWARY & ANR. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Kaptan Singh Versus The State of Uttar Pradesh and others
Atul Kumar Ben and another Vs. Union of India and others
Law Laid Down:- Any undeserved or unfair advantage gained by a party invoking the jurisdiction of the Court, in the facts of the case, must be neutralized, as the institution of litigation cannot be permitted to confer any advantage on a party by the delayed action of the Court. No litigant can derive any benefit from the mere pendency of a case in a Court of Law, as the interim order always merges into the final order to be passed in Full Judgment
Anand Kumar Tiwari & Ors. Versus High Court of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
Prem Narayan Singh and Ors. Versus Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Sabit Khan Vs. State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - 1. Section 19 of the PC Act requires previous sanction for prosecution. Sub section (3) thereof puts a rider that absence of or any error, irregularities etc. in sanction will not be a ground to reverse a finding or sentence unless in the opinion of the Court failure of justice has infact occasioned thereby. Sub section (4) thereof relates to raising an objection in this regard at an early stage in the proceedings. 2. The Act of granting Full Judgment
Sapphire Institute of Nursingh and Science Vs. State of M.P. & Anr.
Law laid down - Madhya Pradesh Ayurvigyan Vishwavidyalay (Eligibility and Enrolment of Students for Under Graduate Courses) Ordinance, 2014 - Clause-9 of the Madhya Pradesh Ayurvigyan Vishwavidyalay (Eligibility and Enrolment of Students for Under Graduate Courses) Ordinance, 2014 is independent to other clauses of the Ordinance. Clause – 5 to 8 of the said Ordinance deals with admission of students and relating to supply of certified list of such admitted students whereas Clause-9 independently deals with “enrolment”. Thus, contention of petitioner Full Judgment