Judgments
Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh Vs. The State Of Bihar and Ors
Shri Saurav Jain & Anr vs M/s A. B. P. Design & Anr
AMARENDRA DHARI SINGH VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
PARDESI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE,
SH. DINESH YADAV & ANR VERSUS PARAMJIT KAUR
Sachin Pathak Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - Granting reservation to a woman is a special provision of reservation and would be implemented in the manner in which a horizontal reservation is implemented. The concept of migration from one category to another on the basis of merit may hold good in vertical reservation, but in horizontal reservation the same is not applicable. Full Judgment
ANKIT PATEL Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS
Law laid down:- Writ Appeal under Section 2(1) of the M.P. Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyay Peeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 assailing the order passed by the writ court dismissing the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking benefit of discount/exemption to the extent of 90% on the motor vehicle tax penalty in terms of Notification dated 02.08.2019 issued by the Transport Department, Govt. of M.P. under Section 21(1) of the M.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1991 – Held Full Judgment
UNION OF INDIA & ANR VERSUS ONKAR NATH DHAR
Dena Bank (now Bank of Baroda) versus C. Shivakumar Reddy and Anr.
Surajdeo Mahto and Anr. VERSUS The State of Bihar
M/s. Cheminova India Ltd. & Anr. Versus State of Punjab & Anr.
AKASHGANGA INFRAVENTURES INDIA LIMITED VERSUS NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI
DAVINDRA MAHEY VERSUS COMMISSIONER, SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
DEVASTOTRA PODDAR & ANR VERSUS FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARDS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS
GEORGES MONIN SAS AND ANR VERSUS PEKERS AND COMPANY & ORS
PRADEEP WIG VERSUS DDIT (INV.), UNIT 3(2), DELHI & ANR
RAJIV KUMAR VERSUS GOVERNMENT OF INDIA AND ORS
Munnalal and Jagdish Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - (1) Prosecutrix in a rape case – conviction can be based only on the basis of solitary evidence of prosecutrix but such witness should be of “sterling quality”. Citation relied upon - Krishna Kumar Malik Vs. State of Haryana [(2011) 7 SCC 130] & Rai Sandeep @ Deepu Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) reported in (2012) 8 SCC 21]. (2) While deciding rape case, the Court must also evaluate the impact of such insinuation on a person Full Judgment