Judgments
INDRA DEO GARG VERSUS DIVINE INFRACON PVT. LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
MRS RITA DABAS VERSUS DIVINE INFRACON PVT. LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
MRS. NAVITA SUHAG VERSUS DIVINE INFRACON PVT. LIMITED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
SULPHUR MILLS LIMITED VERSUS DHARAMAJ CROP GUARD LIMITED AND ANR
Radheshyam vs. Kamla Devi & Others
Law laid down - (1) Under Section 112 of Indian Evidence Act birth during marriage, is conclusive proof of legitimacy, therefore bars DNA testing but when blood relation of siblings is being challenged, there shall be no bar under Section 112 of Indian Evidence Act. Full Judgment
Raghuram @ Raghoram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (1) Dying Declaration recorded by Doctor – The wife of appellant was burnt 100% and she was conscious and oriented but her condition was grim. It was natural for Doctor to undertake the task of recording dying declaration himself in view of precarious condition..... Para 26 Citation relied upon – Abdul Majid Abdul Rehman, AIR 1976 SC 1782. (2) Appellant's subsequent conduct relevant under Section 8 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Para 30. Full Judgment
Smt. Brijesh Shrivastava Vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and others
BIMAL KUMAR JAIN and NARESH JAIN VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
Arun Singh Chouhan Vs. State of MP & Ors.
Law laid down - Article 226 of the Constitution – Writ of Quo Warranto - Can be issued to test the validity of appointment to a public office. The said writ cannot be issued to examine the posting or working of an officer to particular place. Writ of Quo Warranto – Necessary party - The person against whom writ is prayed for is a necessary party. Public Interest Litigation – Conduct of petitioner - A practising Advocate has chosen not to answer the Full Judgment