Judgments
Lovekush Institute Of Nursing Gurukul College Parisar Versus State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors
Praveen Kumar Pandey Versus Sudeep Kumar Verma and Anr
MS. X VERSUS THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.
Ankesh Gurjar @ Ankit Gurjar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law Laid Down:- (1) The concept of arrest/apprehension in a police lockup/jail as contemplated by Chapter V of Cr.P.C. is not recognized in the Scheme of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. (2) The Juvenile as and when apprehended and detained is immediately sent to Observation Home/Fit facility/One-stop Home or any of the Institutions contemplated under 2015 Act either for the period of 24 hrs between arrest and production before the Board and also thereafter during pendency of Full Judgment
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS. Versus SMT. SURESHWATI
IN RE: ADVOCATE ON RECORD INCLUDES A PROPRIETARY FIRM ETC.
HARYANA SPACE APPLICATION CENTRE (HARSAC) & ANR. Versus M/S PAN INDIA CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD.
Khyaliram Vs. State of M.P. and others
Law laid down:- (1) There is no vested right to file a Second Appeal either under unamended Section 44(2)(b) or amended Sec.44(3)(b) M.P. Land Revenue Code. (2) Therefore, the remedy of Second Appeal which was otherwise available to the petitioner under the unamended MPLRC at the time of dismissal of his First Appeal, cannot be made available under the amended Sec.44(3)(b) M.P. Land Revenue Code not only because remedy of Second Appeal is not available after the amendment in the MPLRC Full Judgment
Mukesh Patle Versus Shailendra Verma and Ors
Santosh Kumar Pandey Versus Union of India and Ors
Smt. Mamta Devi Versus State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors
Shivcharan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law Laid down:- Abetment of an offence, falls under the category of “Inchoate Offences” – Characteristics of an Inchoate Offence – When can an accused be held guilty of having abetted an offence – assessing the guilt of an accused in abetment of suicide by wife from domestic violence/matrimonial cruelty. Full Judgment
MANISH KUMAR VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER
THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Versus PANDARINATHAN GOVINDARAJULU & ANR.
RAMA NARANG VERSUS RAMESH NARANG AND OTHERS
LAKHVIR SINGH ETC. VERSUS THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
VENIGALLA KOTESWARAMMA VERSUS MALAMPATI SURYAMBA & ORS.
BAJRANGA (Dead) by LRs. Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS
Dharmendra Jatav Vs. State of M.P., and others
Law laid down:- (1) The offending sale was made vide registered sale deed dated 01/03/1994. The lease was originally granted to Kishanlal in the year 1966-67 after coming into force of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (for short 'the Code') and after his death, the name of his heir Narayan Jatav was entered by way of succession vide entry No.40/93-94 on 30/12/1993. Bhumiswami right was recorded on 10/01/1994 in favour of Narayan Jatav the father of the present petitioner. Full Judgment