Judgments
CENTRE FOR AVIATION POLICY, SAFETY AND RESEARCH CAPSR VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
MR. NIRANJAN SWARUP GUPTA & ORS VERSUS BIMLA DEVI & ORS
UMED SINGH VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
Pramod Kumar Lihkhar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law Laid Down - While framing a charge, the Court is expected to apply its mind to the entire record and documents placed therewith before the Court. No meticulous examination of evidence is needed for considering whether the case would end in conviction or not. However, the Court is required to consider and apply its judicial mind, whether the allegations taken as a whole will, prima facie constitute an offence and if so, whether continuation of proceedings is an abuse of Full Judgment
Smt. Prembai Versus State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down:- Medical Board opined that the victim has history of delayed milestone, poor understanding, poor self-care, inabilities to speak, drooling of saliva since childhood. The Medical Board further opined that on examination, it was found that patient is unable to take care of self, her hygiene is very poor and her intellectual abilities are poor. In view of these factors, patient was opined to suffer from SEVERE MENTAL RETARDATION WITH BEHAVIORAL PROBLEMS. The Medical Board was further of the Full Judgment
Mrs. Sihanta Devi Vs. The State Of Bihar and Ors
Santosh Nag Versus State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors
Soukhiram Patel Versus State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors
LAKSHMI MURDESHWAR PURI VERSUS SAKET GOKHALE
Suzlon Energy Limited & another Vs. State of M.P.
ISMAILBHAI I. KANSARA (D) THROUGH LR VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
Johanram Versus Gayabai and Anr
Radheshyam Pathak (dead) through legal representatives Versus Kanhaiyaa Gond and Ors
Shankar Prasad Versus Radheshyam and Ors
GOVIND SWAROOP CHATURVEDI VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
M/S JYOTI SARUP MITTAL VERSUS THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER-XXIII, SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Mamta Nair Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr.
Sanjay Jain Vs. The State of MP & Ors.
Law Point - Service Law-Clause 22 of the Contract - Deeming provision of termination on remaining absent for more than one month-The principles of natural justice must be read into the provision. The Clause-22 is interpreted by taking into account the similar provisions of standing orders etc. Fair Play and Reasonableness -The procedure adopted by employer must be just fair and reasonable. Moreso when its impact is on the right of livelihood of a person. Validity of order-Judicial Review -The validity of an order Full Judgment