Judgments
MOHD. AZIM VERSUS DDA & ANOTHER
Mohamad Ibrahim Vs. Shri R. K. Mishra
Law laid down - 4. Jurisdiction under Article 215 of the Constitution shall not be exercised to make provision of Section 20 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 otiose nor Section 20 be interpreted strictly to render power under Article 215 of the Constitution nugatory. Article 215 of the Constitution and Section 20 of Contempt of Court Act is to be construed harmoniously and only in exceptional or blatant case of contempt High Court shall exercise power beyond period of one Full Judgment
OM PRAKASH DHANUKA Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR
Smt. Chetna Dholakhandi and Others vs. State of MP & Others
Law laid down - (1) No petition shall be entertained under Section 178 of MP Land Revenue Code unless it is supported by affidavit of the party/parties stating that no title dispute is in existence regarding the land in question. Full Judgment
(1) Smt. Guddi Rawat (2) Virendra Rawat Versus State of MP
Law laid down - (1) As Section 306 of IPC makes abatement of commission of suicide punishable, therefore, for making a person liable for an offence punishable under Section 306 IPC, it is a duty of the prosecution to establish that such person has abated the commission of suicide and for the purpose of determining the act of the accused it is necessary to see that his act must fall in any of the 3 categories as enumerated under Section 107 of Full Judgment
PRUTHIVIRAJ JAYANTIBHAI VANOL Vs. DINESH DAYABHAI VALA AND OTHERS
Smt. Indira Chaurasia (deceased) through LRs vs. Director, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti & others
Law laid down - (1) Where dispute exists between plaintiff and Krishi Upaj Mandi with regard to boundary wall and no any agricultural land is involved, therefore no relief could be sought against the State and provisions of Order 6 Rule 4(a) of CPC shall not be attracted. Full Judgment
Vice Chancellor Anand Agriculture University Versus Kanubhai Nanubhai Vaghela and Anr.
Arvind Kumar Tiwari & Ors. Versus The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
M/s. Dyna Chem Proprietor Mahesh Kumar Punjabi Versus Jaipaldas Punjabi
Law laid down - (1) By no stretch of imagination can it be said that if the two suits are consolidated, it would save valuable time and energy of the court and the parties because in the suit for eviction, only judgement is to be declared whereas in the suit of declaration the entire evidence is still to be led by the parties which is likely to take sufficiently long time in the present scenario of COVID-19. In the considered opinion Full Judgment