Judgments
MAHENDER SINGH ALIAS SUNNY & ANR VERSUS THE STATE & ORS
M/S HERO MOTOCORP LIMITED VERSUS M/S R.K. MAHAJAN ENTERPRISES AND ORS.
PARTH SARTHI YADAV VERSUS ALL INDIA COUNCIL OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS
SOHAN PAL SINGH SHARMA VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR
SUBHASH CHANDRA SHARMA AND ANR VERSUS UNION OF INDIA ANR ORS
SUMAN & ANR VERSUS SHYAMVEER SINGH & ANR
VIJAY KUMAR & ORS VERSUS MERA BABA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.
PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH AND ORS. Versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.
Neena Aneja & Anr. Versus Jai Prakash Associates Ltd.
Health Care Medical Devices Pvt. Ltd. Vs. MP Public Health Services Corp. Ltd., & Anr
Law laid down - Blacklisting and debarment-it has drastic impact on the contractor - Thus, such a drastic action can be taken by following “due process”. Issuance of a notice by which contractor can gather the nature of allegations and intended action to be taken is must. The order of blacklisting/debarment cannot be passed unless such an action is proposed in the show cause notice or it can be clearly inferred by reading of notice that such an action was proposed. The Full Judgment
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd & another Vs. Kailash Chandra
Law laid down - Alternative Remedy-Article 226 of the Constitution and Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - The respondent employees were “workmen” and appellant Corporation is an 'industry' within the meaning of ID Act, 1947. The employer contended that writ petition could not have been entertained and respondents should have been relegated to avail the remedy under the ID Act. The contention is not accepted because (i) the punishment orders under question before the learned Single Judge were based on admitted documents of Full Judgment