Judgments
Saroj Dehariya Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law Laid Down:- The intention behind enacting the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 as well as the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 is to give a succour to those upon whom the destiny has inflicted various kinds of disabilities and to provide them an opportunity to participate in the social milieu like any other able bodied person. Despite progressive steps taken by the Courts and the initiatives taken by the Government, the Full Judgment
INDRA DEVI VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
Lakshman Singh Versus State of Bihar (now Jharkhand)
Prakash Gupta Versus Securities and Exchange Board of India
SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. & ORS. Versus M/s. S. KUMAR’s ASSOCIATES AKM (JV)
M/S BSCPL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
NATIOANL RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION & ANR VERSUS M/S SOM SHIVA IMPEX LTD
Union of India Versus Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India and Ors.
Eastern Coalfields Limited Versus Anadinath Banerjee (D) and Others
Mohammad Sultan Khan Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Law laid down - Article 226 of the Constitution – Judicial review of contract matter – Law summarised- if the decision making process is shown to be arbitrary, unreasonable and hits Wednesbury principles, interference can be made. Clause 8 of the NIT – The bidder was required to furnish informations regarding the vehicle to be provided by him. The respondent No.4 has not filled up relevant entries of the prescribed form and did not file relevant documents along with his tender. The Full Judgment
M/S LAUREATE BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. VERSUS CHARANJEET SINGH
Somesh Chaurasia Versus State of M.P. & Anr. - 22/07/2021
DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD & ANR. VERSUS SEEMA KAPOOR
AP MAHESH COOPERATIVE URBAN BANK SHAREHOLDERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION VERSUS RAMESH KUMAR BUNG AND ORS.
Kamleshwar Dixit vs. State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - 1) Section 3 - NSA Act, 1980- The facts situation and “pressures of the day” are relevant factors for examining the validity of a detention order. In a pandemic-like situation, one incident of black marketing of an essential drug can be sufficient to invoke the detention law. 2) Detention order – Indisputably, para 4 of the detention order is erroneously pasted from elsewhere. There is no basis of the said para – The Doctrine of Severability was applied Full Judgment