Judgments
Rajasthan Patrika Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law Laid Down:- Review Petition - Review petition can be entertained if there exits a mistake or error which is apparent on the face of record. Under the garb of review, the petitioner cannot be permitted to re-argue or re-agitate the entire matter. Re-appraisel of evidence or re-hearing of case without there being any error apparent is impermissible. Working Journalists and other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 - This is a beneficent piece of legislation. Thus, it Full Judgment
Dr Naresh Kumar Mangla Versus Smt. Anita Agarwal & Ors. Etc.
Registrar Karnataka University & Anr. Versus Dr. Prabhugouda & Anr.
ANGLO AMERICAN METALLURGICAL COAL PTY LTD. VERSUS MMTC LTD.
Dheerendra Dwivedi @ Dheeru Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - Order granting interim custody of vehicle under Section 451 or under Section 457(1) of Code of Criminal Procedure is interlocutory order and criminal revision is not maintainable against it. Full Judgment
Aruni Sahgal Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - Order granting interim custody of vehicle under Section 451 or under Section 457(1) of Code of Criminal Procedure is interlocutory order and criminal revision is not maintainable against it. Full Judgment
AJAI KUMAR SRIVASTAVA VERSUS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ) AND ORS
BDR BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. VERSUS SHRI LALIT MODI
BRIG. RAVI NAVET VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
CHARU JAIN VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION, GNCT OF DELHI AND ANR
INDIAN RAILWAYS MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGISTS ASSOCIATION VERSUS MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS AND ANR
JAIKISHAN AGGARWAL (BLIND) VERSUS JINENDER KUMAR & ANR
MANOJ ANAND & ANR VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI VERSUS MANISH SISODIA & ORS
SRF LIMITED VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR
Phul Bai Through LR Versus Samaru Ram Sahu & Ors
Pareshrao s/o Laxmanrao Jagdale Versus Addl. Secretary, M.P.P.K.V.V.C Ltd. & others
Law laid down : The up-gradation schemes introduced by the Government/Employer envisage mere placement in the higher pay scale/grant of financial benefits through financial up-gradation on a personal basis. Though normal promotion norms available for consideration of an employee for promotion, would be attracted under the scheme, yet only financial up-gradation could be given, even though the duties of the employee, the designation etc. remain the same, as enjoyed by him before granting of financial up-gradation. Such up-gradation did not Full Judgment