Filter by Date

For the Latest Updates, Please Join Our Channel 

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

HARPREET SINGH VERSUS VIMAL KUMAR PATHAK

C.R.P., 2 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags CPC
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

JAGDISH SINGH VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS

W.P.(C), 10270 of 2020, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Pay
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

JYOTI THAKUR & ANR VERSUS IGNOU & ANR

LPA, 14 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Appeal
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KALPANA SINGH VERSUS GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS

W.P.(C), 115 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

KHANNA JEWELLERS VERSUS KAPIL TANDON & ORS

RC.REV., 599 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS

W.P.(C), 345 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Punishment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

M/S AMRUT IMPEX VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR

W.P.(C), 8668 of 2020, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

M/S EAGLE EYE SECURITY AND HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES VERSUS DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE

ARB.P, 52 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

M/S OPG POWER GENERATION PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS IFCI LIMITED

W.P.(C), 6267 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SHUBHRANSHU MISHRA & ORS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS

W.P.(C), 295 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Pension
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

SIDDHAST INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INNOVATIONS PVT. LTD. VERSUS THE CONTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS DESIGNS TRADEMARKS

ARB.P, 21 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

UNION OF INDIA & ORS VERSUS V.P. MUNGHATE AND ORS

W.P.(C), 13491 of 2019, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

VIKAS YADAV AND ORS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS

W.P.(C), 319 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Pay
Supreme Court of India (Constitution Bench- Five Judge)

Beghar Foundation versus Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Ors.

Review Petition (Civil), -- of 2021, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2021

Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Mahipal Singh Versus State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors

WPCR->WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL [ OTHER MATTER ], 556 of 2020, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

MIHIR GOPE ETC. VERSUS THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Appeal (Crl.), 22-­23 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Raja Bhaiya Singh Vs State of MP

Criminal Revision, 1813 of 2020, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2021

Law laid down - 1. The order dated 23.3.2020 of Supreme Court related to extension of time limit, was not applicable for filing the challan within 60 days or 90 days as prescribed under CrPC. 2. Order upon the application filed for default bail under section 167(2) of CrPC is not an interlocutory order because it decided the valuable right of default bail finally at that stage. Therefore, revision is tenable against the aforesaid order. 3. (i) Period for filing the challan will Full Judgment

Tags NDPS
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Dr. Chandramani Mishra Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh & others

WRIT PETITION, 12461 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2021

Law laid down - If the Disciplinary Authority proceeds under Rule 14 of the M.P. Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1966, then it does not mean that the Authority can only impose major penalty, but it can be culminate into a minor penalty too. Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

DR. RAJDEEP KAPOOR VS. MOHD. SARWAR KHAN AND ANOTHER

Misc. Appeal, 6597 of 2019, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2021

Law laid down - Evidence Act with strict technicalities is not applicable in mutation proceedings. Revenue Officer is only required to do enquiry to reach satisfaction in respect of evidence filed regarding acquisition of rights over land. Examination on oath and cross-examination need not be done by Tehsildar in mutation proceedings. Full Judgment

Tags Evidence Will
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DHRUV KRISHAN MAGGU VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS

W.P.(C), 5454 of 2020, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2021

Full Judgment