Judgments
THE CHAIRPERSON GOVERNING BODY DAULAT RAM COLLEGE VERSUS DR. ASHA & ORS.
DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (APPELLATE AUTHORITY) VERSUS AJAI KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Kirti & Anr. Etc. VERSUS Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
M/s. Padia Timber Company(P) Ltd. versus The Board of Trustees of Visakhapatnam Port Trust Through its Secretary
HARI OM @ HERO VERSUS STATE OF U.P.
ANIL SINGHAL VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF INCOME TAX INVESTIGATION & ANR
PUSHPA JHANJI & ANR VERSUS PAWAN CHOPRA & ORS
RAJAN BHANDARI & ANR VERSUS SHRINIWAS VERMA
SHELLY KAUR VERSUS THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS
Murali VERSUS State rep. by the Inspector of Police
Alok Kumar Choubey Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Whether or not in a particular case the writ court should entertain a petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution despite availability of alternative remedy, would always depend on the fact situation of a given case. Seven well-recognized exceptions to the rule of alternative remedy for entertaining a writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution are: (i) where the writ petition has been filed for enforcement of fundamental rights; (ii) where there has been violation of principle of natural Full Judgment
THE INDIAN PERFORMING RIGHT SOCIETY LTD. VERSUS ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK (INDIA) LTD.
Lala @ Daneshwar Versus State of Chhattisgarh
Criminal courts should not issue non-bailable warrant of arrest straightway at the first instance and investigating officer should inform the accused about filing of charge-sheet specially when he is on bail Full Judgment
Modern Medical Institute Society Lalpur and Anr Versus State of Chhattisgarh and Ors
Sasan Power Limited, Singrauli versus Madhya Pradesh Micro and Small Enterprise Facilitation Council & another
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 -Section 17 and 18- the reference to the Council- the provision is beneficent in nature and, therefore, must be given wide construction. The respondent No.2’s reference was rightly entertained by the Council. More so, when objections (Annexure P/6 & P/10) filed by the petitioner regarding jurisdiction of council is not pregnant with a factual objection regarding non filing of memorandum by respondent No.2 under Section 8 of the Act. Section 18 of Micro, Small Full Judgment