Judgments
Beghar Foundation versus Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Ors.
Mahipal Singh Versus State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors
MIHIR GOPE ETC. VERSUS THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Raja Bhaiya Singh Vs State of MP
Law laid down - 1. The order dated 23.3.2020 of Supreme Court related to extension of time limit, was not applicable for filing the challan within 60 days or 90 days as prescribed under CrPC. 2. Order upon the application filed for default bail under section 167(2) of CrPC is not an interlocutory order because it decided the valuable right of default bail finally at that stage. Therefore, revision is tenable against the aforesaid order. 3. (i) Period for filing the challan will Full Judgment
Dr. Chandramani Mishra Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh & others
Law laid down - If the Disciplinary Authority proceeds under Rule 14 of the M.P. Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1966, then it does not mean that the Authority can only impose major penalty, but it can be culminate into a minor penalty too. Full Judgment
DR. RAJDEEP KAPOOR VS. MOHD. SARWAR KHAN AND ANOTHER
Law laid down - Evidence Act with strict technicalities is not applicable in mutation proceedings. Revenue Officer is only required to do enquiry to reach satisfaction in respect of evidence filed regarding acquisition of rights over land. Examination on oath and cross-examination need not be done by Tehsildar in mutation proceedings. Full Judgment
DHRUV KRISHAN MAGGU VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Ramcharan Patel Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - (1) Section 302, 120B and Section 201 of IPC : Vikki Bai was not traceable from matrimonial house and hence her father-in-law lodged "Gum Insaan" report in Police Station. Father of Vikki Bai also lodged the report that she is murdered by appellants. Body or remains of Vikki Bai could never be traced. The court below held the appellants as guilty on the basis of circumstantial evidence. Held : Conclusion of guilt must be based on circumstances Full Judgment