Judgments
Murali VERSUS State rep. by the Inspector of Police
Alok Kumar Choubey Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Whether or not in a particular case the writ court should entertain a petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution despite availability of alternative remedy, would always depend on the fact situation of a given case. Seven well-recognized exceptions to the rule of alternative remedy for entertaining a writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution are: (i) where the writ petition has been filed for enforcement of fundamental rights; (ii) where there has been violation of principle of natural Full Judgment
THE INDIAN PERFORMING RIGHT SOCIETY LTD. VERSUS ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK (INDIA) LTD.
Lala @ Daneshwar Versus State of Chhattisgarh
Criminal courts should not issue non-bailable warrant of arrest straightway at the first instance and investigating officer should inform the accused about filing of charge-sheet specially when he is on bail Full Judgment
Modern Medical Institute Society Lalpur and Anr Versus State of Chhattisgarh and Ors
Sasan Power Limited, Singrauli versus Madhya Pradesh Micro and Small Enterprise Facilitation Council & another
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 -Section 17 and 18- the reference to the Council- the provision is beneficent in nature and, therefore, must be given wide construction. The respondent No.2’s reference was rightly entertained by the Council. More so, when objections (Annexure P/6 & P/10) filed by the petitioner regarding jurisdiction of council is not pregnant with a factual objection regarding non filing of memorandum by respondent No.2 under Section 8 of the Act. Section 18 of Micro, Small Full Judgment
CDR RAVINDRA PAL SINGH VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
DABUR INDIA LIMITED VERSUS MARICO LIMITED
ICICI BANK VERSUS JAIN LOGISTICS & ORS
PHELAN ENERGY INDIA R J PVT. LTD. VERSUS INDUSIND BANK & ANR
RADHIKA BYRN VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR
WG CDR VIDHU SINGH VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Rajendra Singh Pawar and others Vs. State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - Police Officer shall enter complaint in General Diary as per M. P. Police Regulation 634. Give number of entry to complainant. If cognizable offence is disclosed First Information Report shall be registered. If preliminary inquiry is required then same shall be completed within 15 days. In cases of delay after giving reasons preliminary inquiry shall be completed within 42 days and result shall be communicated to complainant. In case of failure to complete preliminary inquiry in 42 Full Judgment
