Judgments
NAFEES AHMAD VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR
PACIFIC PROJECTS LIMITED VERSUS ASSTT CIT
VAYAM TECHOLOGIES LIMITED AND ANR VERSUS CANARA BANK AND ORS
ANUPAM & ORS VERSUS UNIVERSITY OF DELHI
CITY LIFELINE TRAVELS PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS DELHI JAL BOARD
GOVIND SWAROOP CHATURVEDI VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
GUNVEEN SINGH VERSUS THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)& ANR
MOHD. BABU QURAISHI @ HAJI BABU & ORS VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
PRUDENT ARC LIMITED VERSUS SIDHA NEELKANTH PAPER INDUSTRIES & ORS
REENA GAMBHIR VERSUS CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ORS
SEEMA NAAZ & ORS VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
SHIV KUMAR GUPTA VERSUS M/S PRAKASH TENT & FURNISHING HOUSE
M/S WEST BENGAL ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. VERSUS PRASAR BHARTI & ORS
Nageswar Sonkesri Vs. State of MP & Ors
Law laid down - [i] The Presidential Notification issued under Article 342(1) specifying the Scheduled Tribe/Scheduled Caste can be amended only by the law made by the Parliament and it cannot be varied by way of administrative circular, judicial pronouncements or by the State. The Presidential order must be read as it is. [ii] Since “Halba Koshti” is not mentioned as “Scheduled Tribe” in the Presidential order, therefore, it cannot be held to be scheduled tribe. [iii] The Hon’ble Supreme Court Full Judgment
Zaid Pathan and others Vs. State of M.P
Law laid down - Section 195(1) Cr.P.C. is attracted at the stage of taking cognizance. There is no bar under Section 195 of the Cr.P.C. in respect of registration of FIR, therefore, FIR for an offence under Section 188 of the IPC can be registered by the police and after investigation on the basis of the FIR and the material collected during the course of investigation, a competent public servant can file the complaint before the concerned court. What is barred Full Judgment