Judgments
PRADEEP KUMAR SONTHALIA VERSUS DHIRAJ PRASAD SAHU @ DHIRAJ SAHU & ANR.
Suresh Shah Versus Hipad Technology India Private Limited
IN RE: THE PROPER TREATMENT OF COVID 19 PATIENTS AND DIGNIFIED HANDLING OF DEAD BODIES IN THE HOSPITALS ETC.
M/S GALAXY TRANSPORT AGENCIES VERSUS M/S NEW J.K. ROADWAYS
Nayara Energy Limited Versus The State of Gujarat and others
SAURAV YADAV & ORS. Versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
AMIT KHANEJA AND ORS VERSUS IL & FS FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.
KRISHAN LAL GARG VERSUS INVESTOR EDUCATION AND PROTECTION FUND AUTHORITY & ANR
M/S NEW ERA PROJECTS VERSUS M/S SENBO ENGINEERING LIMITED & ORS
Rajasthan Patrika Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law Laid Down:- Review Petition - Review petition can be entertained if there exits a mistake or error which is apparent on the face of record. Under the garb of review, the petitioner cannot be permitted to re-argue or re-agitate the entire matter. Re-appraisel of evidence or re-hearing of case without there being any error apparent is impermissible. Working Journalists and other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 - This is a beneficent piece of legislation. Thus, it Full Judgment
Dr Naresh Kumar Mangla Versus Smt. Anita Agarwal & Ors. Etc.
Registrar Karnataka University & Anr. Versus Dr. Prabhugouda & Anr.
ANGLO AMERICAN METALLURGICAL COAL PTY LTD. VERSUS MMTC LTD.
Dheerendra Dwivedi @ Dheeru Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - Order granting interim custody of vehicle under Section 451 or under Section 457(1) of Code of Criminal Procedure is interlocutory order and criminal revision is not maintainable against it. Full Judgment
Aruni Sahgal Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - Order granting interim custody of vehicle under Section 451 or under Section 457(1) of Code of Criminal Procedure is interlocutory order and criminal revision is not maintainable against it. Full Judgment