Judgments
OM PRAKASH CHAUTALA VERSUS THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
University of Delhi Versus Union of India & Ors.
Dr. (Major) Meeta Sahai VERSUS State of Bihar & Ors.
MUNISH KAKKAR VERSUS NIDHI KAKKAR
The fact, however,remains that the relationship appears to have deteriorated to such an extent that both parties see little good in each other, an aspect supported by the counselor’s report; though the respondent insists that she wants to stay with the appellant. In our view, this insistence is only to somehow not let a decree of divorce be passed against the respondent. This is only to frustrate the endeavour of the appellant to get a decree of divorce,completely losing sight Full Judgment
Brigadier L.I. Singh YSM Versus Union of India & Ors.
Jatinder Kumar Vs. State of Haryana
HARINDER SINGH @ HIRA Versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB
KOOLI SASEENDRAN & ORS. Versus STATE OF KERALA ETC.
CENTRAL ORGANISATION FOR RAILWAY ELECTRIFICATION VERSUS M/S ECI-SPIC-SMO-MCML (JV) A JOINT VENTURE COMPANY
Saketa Vaksana LLP & Anr. Versus Kaukutla Sarala & Ors.
Chandigarh Housing Board Versus M/s. Parasvanath Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr
M/s Genentech Inc. & Ors. Versus Drug Controller General of India & Ors.
Dr. Amritlal Rohledar Versus State of Chhattisgarh
First information report by police cannot be lodged/registered against a medical practitioner for commission of offence under the provisions of Section 23 of the Preconception and Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994, only complaint can be filed under Section 28 of the said Act before the jurisdictional criminal Court. गर्भधारण पूर्व और निदान-तकनीक (लिंग चयन प्रतिबंध) अधिनियम, 1994 की धारा 23 के प्रावधानों के अंतर्गत किये गये अपराध के लिये पुलिस, चिकित्सा व्यवसायी के विरूद्ध प्रथम सूचना प्रतिवेदन Full Judgment
