Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10571
of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Writ Petition (227), 299
of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
WRIT PETITION, 15286
of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
Criminal Appeal, 489
of 2011, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
Criminal Appeal, 1112
of 2014, Judgment Date: Oct 12, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 23988
of 2017, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10394
of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
MA->MISC. APPEAL, 794
of 2004, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
WRIT PETITION, 18935
of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 18921
of 2017, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018
Law laid down -
[1] After registration of the first FIR the subsequent FIR for offence committed in the course of same transaction or offence arising as a consequence of prior offence, is not permissible and the subsequent complaint in such cases applying the test of “sameness” and “consequence” can be treated as statement under Section 161(3) of the Cr.P.C. in the FIR already registered but if the subsequent complaint is in regard to same incident but filed as a counter Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Criminal Appeal, 1665
of 2000, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018
Law laid down -
Penetration is sufficient to constitute sexual intercourse for offence of rape. Complete penetration is not essential. Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
WA, 75
of 2017, Judgment Date: Oct 11, 2018
Law Laid Down -
The supervisory capacity necessarily has to be examined keeping in view the manual, unskilled, skilled, clerical work and the person performing such work is a “workman”. Meeting different professionals to promote sale of product of Pharmaceutical Company cannot be said to be manual or clerical work done by the Medical Representatives as it requires knowledge of product, its uses and also persuasive skills. May be, the Medical Representative does not supervise any person but he is the Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10379
of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 10, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1192
of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 10, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1305
of 2008, Judgment Date: Oct 10, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1129
of 2012, Judgment Date: Oct 09, 2018
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
MA->MISC. APPEAL, 24
of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 09, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10322
of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 08, 2018
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
Writ Petition (227), 854
of 2018, Judgment Date: Oct 08, 2018
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
SA->SECOND APPEAL, 1486
of 1999, Judgment Date: Oct 06, 2018
Full Judgment
