Judgments
THE MANAGEMENT OF SRI RAMNARAYAN MILLS LTD. Versus SECRETARY COIMBATORE DISTRICT TEXTILE WORKERS UNION(HMS) AND ORS
North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation VERSUS Smt. Sujatha
M/s Fives Stein India Project Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata Versus State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - 1. The expression “shall” is not conclusive to determine the provision as directory or mandatory. The Court is required to ascertain the real intention of the Legislature which will include the examination, nature and design of the statute and the consequences. 2. In all cases, failure to perform a duty within the time limit, does not render the action a nullity. Where a provision lays down a period within which the public body should perform any function, the provision Full Judgment
M/S HINDON FORGE PVT. LTD. & ANR. VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH DISTRICT MAGISTRATE GHAZIABAD & ANR.
GEETA DEVI & ANR. Versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Mohammad Shahid & Another
Law Laid Down - Evidence as to the cause of death is relevant not only in relation to the cause of death of the person making the statement but also to the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in death. In the suicide note when the prosecutrix has tried to convey that the accused were hungry (for sex) and that she became their food (victim), it clearly indicates that she was violated and that she did not want to live life of Full Judgment
Aarya Maansingh Vs. State of M.P. & Others
REENA HAZARIKA VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM
KAMIL VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Mukhtyar Jabbar Tadvi Versus State of Maharashtra
NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST VERSUS SHEELA RAMCHANDRA TIKHE
M/s S.V.E.C. Construction Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & others
Law Laid Down - The question whether time is essence of contract or not, depends upon the intention of the parties. Here, the petitioner sought modification of work order so as to complete it within the time granted and then himself chose todetermine the contract. Thus, he understood that the time was essence of the contract. Such conduct of the petitioner as well as on behalf of the respondents shows that the parties intended to complete the contract within time frame. Full Judgment