Judgments
NARAYAN MALHARI THORAT VERSUS VINAYAK DEORAO BHAGAT AND ANR
CHHANNU LAL VERMA VERSUS THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY VERSUS BIRLA SUPER BULK TERMINAL (NOW A UNIT OF ULTRA TECH CEMENT LTD.) AND ORS.
PALANI VERSUS STATE OF TAMIL NADU
RAMJI VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB
Rakesh Rathore & Another vs. State of MP & Anr
AHMED ABDULLA AHMED AL GHURAIR(THROUGH THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR. BARTHOLOMEW KAMYA) & ANR. VERSUS STAR HEALTH AND ALLIED INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS
State of Madhya Pradesh and others VERSUS Abhijit Singh Pawar
Sankatha Prasad (Since Deceased) And Another Vs. Ramraj (Since Deceased) And 20 Others
Ajay Bafna Versus Smt. Kamla Bai Bhattad
Suresh Singh Bhadoria Versus Central Bureau of Investigtion
Law laid down - In terms of Section 170(1) of CrPC, the investigating agency is mandated to produce an accused into custody for the non-bailable offence. The argument that the Court should have issued summons in respect of such offence, cannot be accepted. Inherent power of judicial review under Section 482 of CrPC presupposes that the Court is required to see whether the trial Court has abused the process of law or it is necessary to annul the proceedings for securing the Full Judgment
Sachin Rathi Vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited and another
Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission Versus Surendra Kumar & Ors
South Delhi Municipal Corporation Versus SMS AAMW Tollways Private Ltd
The Central Board of Secondary Education and Anr. Versus T.K. Rangarajan and Ors
M/s.Anik Industries Ltd Vs. M/s.DCM Shriram Consolidated Ltd
Law laid down - [a] If the arbitration clause is contained in the annexure to the contract document and the annexure is specifically mentioned therein, then the arbitration agreement exists between the parties. [b] Sec.8 of the Act mandates a judicial authority to refer the parties to arbitration in case whether pending action is subject matter of an arbitration agreement and in such cases the judicial authority does not commit any error in disposing of the civil action while referring the Full Judgment