Judgments
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH Versus RAJ KUMAR
Dineshbhai Chandubhai Patel VERSUS State of Gujarat & Ors
National Kamgar Union VERSUS Kran Rader Pvt. Ltd. & Ors
Leena Vivek Masal VERSUS State of Maharashtra & Anr
M/S. INOX WIND LTD Versus M/S THERMOCABLES LTD
Alok Sharma Vs. Smt. Nisha Chaubey
SUSME BUILDERS PVT. LTD. Vs. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY AND ORS.
Jagdish Valecha Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors.
Caparo Engineering India Ltd Vs. Pradhanmantri Engineering Shramik Sanghthan
S.N. Vijaywargiya Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Law Laid Down - In terms of Section 170(1) of the CrPC, the Investigating Agency is mandated to produce an accused in custody for the non-bailable offence. The argument that the Court should have issued summons in respect of such offence stands rejected. An order dated 20.10.2016 of a Single Bench of this Court in MCRC No.17501/2016 (Rajendra Kori vs. State of Madhya Pradesh) - is overruled. Accused has no right to insist upon investigation by a particular agency – whether State Full Judgment
State of M.P. Vs. Natwar and others
Arun Kumar Pandey Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Law laid down - ➢ Merely registration of the FIR and offence by the Lokayukt Establishment would not debar the petitioner because the judicial proceedings have not deemed to be instituted on the date of attaining the age of superannuation by the petitioner. ➢ The Governor is having the right to withhold or withdraw the pension or part thereof in the contingencies specified in Rule 9(1), in case an employee is found guilty of grave misconduct or negligence committed by him during the Full Judgment