Latest Judgments of Supreme Court of India and M.P High Court.

Referred Cases - 1, ABHIRAM SINGH Vs. C.D. COMMACHEN (DEAD) BY LRS.& ORS. 2, Jagdev Singh Sidhanti vs Pratap Singh Daulta 3, Sankar Dastidar VS Shrimati Banjula Dastidar & Anr Full Judgment

Tags Election Panchayat Election

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SUSHIL KUMAR TRIPATHI & ANR. Vs HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR.

WRIT PETITION, 21918 of 2018, Judgment Date: Sep 19, 2018

Law Laid Down: The Court cannot be indulgent to the petitioners as there may be many other candidates whose applications might have been received after the cut-off date as against more than 1200 applications received within time. Thus, the application forms of the petitioners cannot be directed to be accepted on account of postal delay. The petitioners can seek their remedy against the postal department for delay but the High Court cannot be directed to accept the application forms received after Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Madhav vs. State of M.P.

Criminal Appeal, 727 of 2009, Judgment Date: Sep 19, 2018

Law laid down - Deposition of Investigating Officer-A public servant must be presumed to act honestly and conscientiously and their evidence has to be assessed on its intrinsic worth and cannot be discarded. Plea of Private Defence- Even if an accused does not plead self defence, it is open to the court to consider such a plea if the same arises from the material on record. Common intention under Section 34 of IPC- "Common Intention" implies a pre-arranged plan and acting in concert pursuant to the Full Judgment

Tags Murder

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RajKumar Raghuvanshi {Lakhera} Vs. Smt. Radha Lakhera & Anr.

FA, 159 of 2014, Judgment Date: Sep 18, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Matrimonial Disputes Appeal

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Manish Surekha & Anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

MCRC, 11442 of 2011, Judgment Date: Sep 18, 2018

Law laid down - Defence of the accused cannot be considered at the stage of framing of charge. It can be considered at an appropriate stage/defence evidence. Full Judgment

Tags Forgery And Cheating Fraud

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Kishorilal Dubey Vs. Premchand Shrivastava (deceased) through L.Rs. Smt.Shail Shrivastava & Others

CR, 29 of 2009, Judgment Date: Sep 18, 2018

Law laid down - "Whether the benefit of Section 14(1) of the Limitation Act can be given to the respondents when the earlier suit was decided by the Court who is competent to decide the same" Held - No. “Whether when the earlier suit was decided on merits, the subsequent suit for the same relief is maintainable.” Held- No. Full Judgment

Tags Tenders Revision