Judgments
Parle Agro Private Limited a company Versus Commercial Tax Officer & Others
Deepak alias Preetam Verma and Anr. Vs. State of MP & Anr.
SONIA GANDHI Vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 52(1) AND ORS.
Prabhat Ranjan Singh & Anr. Versus R.K. Kushwaha & Ors.
GOTTUMUKKALA VENKATA KRISHAMRAJU VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Mysore Urban Development Authority VERSUS K.M. Chikkathayamma & Ors.
NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR & ORS. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA THR. SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE
Maj. Amod Kumar Versus Union of India & Anr.
M/s Popular Plastic & others Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & others
Law Laid Down: The State Act i.e. the Madhya Pradesh Jaiv Anaashya Apashishta (Niyantran) Sanshodhan Adhiniyam, 2017 dealing with the elimination of plastic waste which has a larger public interest involved is not irreconcilable with the Central Rules i.e. Plastic Wastes Management Rules, 2016, which deals with minimization of plastic waste, as the State Act goes a step further than the Central Law. Therefore, within the State, both the Central Law and the State Law can be read harmoniously. The State was Full Judgment
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. Smt. Sangita & Anr
Mishrilal through Legal Heirs v/s Samarthmal & Others
SANDEEP WASKALE Vs. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ANOTHER
Premnarayan Yadav Vs. State of MP & another
Manoj Kumar Vs. State of MP & others
Law laid down - The peon and salesman etc. appointed in country/foreign liquor shops run by the excise department and were terminated 4-5 years thereafter on account of the subsequent change in policy to auction such shops, are not entitled to regularization/absorption in government service as they do not fulfill the requisite conditions contained in the scheme dated 16/5/2007 framed by the State government on the basis of the judgment of the supreme court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and Full Judgment
Jehangir D. Mehta Vs. The Real Nayak Sakh Sahkari Maryadit and Another
Law laid down - The order or decision of the arbitration council under Section 57 of the Madhya Pradesh Swayatta Sahakarita Adhiniyam, 1999 is an arbitration award and it is not a decree passed by the civil court as defined under Section 2(2) of the CPC, hence the stamp duty as required by the Schedule 1A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1889 is payable for its execution. Full Judgment