Judgments
State of M.P. Vs. Rajendra Kumar Jain
Law Laid Down - “Whether a daily-wager who is declared permanent by way of classification, by the employer, merely on completion of 240 days of service as daily-wager, without any judicial intervention is entitled to claim salary alongwith increments in the regular pay-scale admissible to a civil post or is merely entitled to salary equivalent to the minimum of the regular pay-scale without increments and in this backdrop whether the impugned orders granting benefit of regular pay-scale with increments are liable to be Full Judgment
Swaraj Abhiyan (VI) versus Union of India & Ors.
STATE OF TAMIL NADU Versus P.K. SINHA AND ANR.
E. SIVAKUMAR Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
State by Lokayuktha Police Versus H. Srinivas
Meenakshi Saxena & Anr. Versus ECGC Ltd. (Formerly known as Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Ltd.) and Anr.
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY & ORS. VERSUSALL U.P. CONSUMER PROTECTION BAR ASSOCIATION
M/S. B. HIMMATLAL AGRAWAL VERSUS COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR.
MAHABIR INDUSTRIES VERSUS PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
LT. COL. VIJAYNATH JHA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
SUNFLAG IRON & STEEL CO. LTD. Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Law Laid Down - In absence of any averment by the petitioner in respect of completion of stage of third sub-menu (Attach Documents); the attaching documents and/or the bid acknowledgment not received from the system as per the tender conditions, it cannot be said that the decision to declare that the petitioner did not submit technical bid online lacks bona fide. The decision taken by the Technical Evaluation and Tender Approval Committee, which is a committee of experts cannot be interfered Full Judgment
Siddharth Dev Singh Vs. State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - "Whether as per proviso (i-a) of Section 51(1) any opportunity of hearing is required to be given before exercising the power of suo moto review - Held- Yes. "Whether any opportunity of hearing is required to be given before obtaining sanction from the higher authority for exercising the powers- Held- Yes. Full Judgment
SHIVANI SINGH Vs. THE STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS
Raghuveer Singh and Others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (1) Where witnesses make inconsistent statements in their evidence either at one stage or at two stages, testimony of such witnesses become unreliable and unworthy of credence and in absence of special circumstances, no conviction can be based on the evidence of such witnesses. (2) Material improvements of version of eye-witness from FIR to the version given in the Court, said evidence cannot be taken into consideration. (3) Failure on part of investigating agency to recover any bloodstained Full Judgment