Judgments
Suresh Singh & Anr. VERSUS State of Madhya Pradesh
Smt. Baljeet Kaur Vs. Harjeet Singh
Law laid down - 1- Mandatory period as prescribed in Section 13-B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to 'the Act, 1955) is discretionary in nature and Court can consider if there is no possibility of the parties resuming cohabitation and there are chances of alternative rehabilitation. 2- The Court can view the medium of video conferencing for seeking divorce under Section 13-B of the Act, 1955 and can also permit genuine representation of the parties through close relations such as Full Judgment
Girraj Sharma Vs. State of MP
Dr. Sandeep Nahta vs. Smt. Deepa alias Jaya Nahta
Pramod Laxman Gudadhe VERSUS Election Commission of India and Ors.
UNION OF INDIA VERSUS RINA DEVI
Kalpana Mehta and others Versus Union of India and others
SARASAMMA @ SARASWATHIYAMMA VERSUS THE STATE REP. BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND OTHERS
Manoharan & Anr. Versus State Rep. by Inspector of Police
MEENAL BHARGAVA VERSUS NAVEEN SHARMA
Bhagwanti Bai Vs. State of MP & Others
Law Laid down - The Madhya Pradesh Bhumigat Pipe Line, Cable Evam Duct (Bhumi Ki Upyokta Ke Adhikaron Ka Arjan) Adhiniyam, 2012” [for short the ‘State Act’] is an Act enacted in pursuance of Entry 5, 6 and 17 of List II, of the 7th Schedule, and not in terms of Entry 43 of List III of the 7th Schedule. Therefore, the State Act is not repugnant to the The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Full Judgment
Balwan Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - "Whether the power of recounting can be delegated- Held- No. "Whether the application for recounting should contain specific reasons for recounting as per Rule 80 of the Election Rules- Held- Yes. Full Judgment