Judgments
Manurai Samaj Dharshala Nyas Vs. The Registrar of Public Trust and another
M/S. COTT BEVERAGES INC. (ROYAL CROWN COLA INTERNATIONAL DIVISION) USA AND THREE OTHERS Vs. M/S. TRISTAR BEVERAGES PVT. LTD., INDORE
Law laid down - The criminal proceedings manifestly attended with malafide and/or where the proceeding is maliciously instituted with ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance on the accused and turning a civil litigation into a criminal litigation, deserves to be quashed. Full Judgment
Gyanchand Jain Vs. State of Madhya Prdesh
Balmukund Singh Gautam Vs. Smt. Neena Vikram Verma
U.P.P.S.C., Through its Chairman & Anr. Versus Rahul Singh & Anr.
Disha Panchal and Others Versus Union of India The Secretary and Others
Dr. Saiyad Ghazanafar Ishtiaque Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - 1. Once the petitioner appointed on the post of Unani Chikitsa Adhikari under Rule 6 of Madhya Pradesh Health Services (Recruitment) Rules 1967, which gives power to the State Government to appoint a person without consultation with Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission and said power is duly endorsed by Rule 3 of Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission (Limitation of Functions) Regulations, 1957 then the said appointment of petitioner would be treated as regular appointment. 2. Once the petitioner Full Judgment
Medical Council of India Versus Vedantaa Institute of Academic Excellence Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
State of M.P. Vs. Latoori Vs. Ors.
Law Laid Down - 1. Mere relationship of the witnesses to the deceased do not per se render them partisan, especially when the version of eye-witness otherwise inspires confidence despite minor contradictions, embellishments and omissions. 2. Detailed graphic and elaborate disclosure of the incident is not per se an indication of witness being tutored or the prosecution story being manufactured. Full Judgment
Lallu alias Dashrath Baghel Vs. State of MP.
State of M.P. Vs. Rajendra Kumar Jain
Law Laid Down - “Whether a daily-wager who is declared permanent by way of classification, by the employer, merely on completion of 240 days of service as daily-wager, without any judicial intervention is entitled to claim salary alongwith increments in the regular pay-scale admissible to a civil post or is merely entitled to salary equivalent to the minimum of the regular pay-scale without increments and in this backdrop whether the impugned orders granting benefit of regular pay-scale with increments are liable to be Full Judgment