Judgments
Yogendra Dusaj vs. State of MP
Mohammad Naushad Quereshi Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Others
National Campaign Committee for Central Legislation on Construction Labour (NCC-CL) Versus Union of India & Ors.
ARUN KUMAR Vs. STATE
ITC LIMITED VERSUS BLUE COAST HOTELS LTD. & ORS.
Director Aryabhatta Research Institute Of Observational Sciences (ARIES) & Anr. Versus Devendra Joshi & Ors.
P. Sreekumar VERSUS State of Kerala & Ors.
SRI RAMESHWAR YADAV & ORS. VERSUS TEH STATE OF BIHAR & ANR.
The State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Nandu Ahirwar
Law laid down - 1. In a case of circumstantial evidence, there must be a chain of evidence so complete as not to leave any reasonable ground for the conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and must show that in all human probability the act must have been done by the accused. 2. In an appeal against the order of acquittal, the Court has to be very cautious in interfering with an appeal unless there are compelling and substantial grounds to Full Judgment
Chief Managing Director, WCL & others Vs. Sheikh Yusuf
Law Laid Down - In absence of any allegation that the date of birth was not correctly recorded in Form-B, a statutory form stipulated under the Mines Rules, 1955, the service record or certificate of registration with Employment Exchange, which are based upon declaration of the employee, cannot be made basis of holding that the date of birth was not correctly mentioned in Form-B. The approximate age determined by the Age Determination Committee to be between 50 to 55 years which Full Judgment
Ashish @ Banti Sen Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - The evidence of injured eye-witness has great evidentiary value. Conviction can be based on the testimony of related eye-witnesses. Full Judgment
The State of Karnataka & Ors. Versus The Karnataka Pawn Brokers Assn. & Ors.
BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA VERSUS KOCHI CRICKET PVT. LTD. AND ETC.
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ramesh Kumar
R. S. Ashatkar Versus Central Bureau of Investigation, Bhopal
Principal, Maharshi Vidya Mandir Lehdra Naka, Sagar Vs. Labour Court, Sagar & Another
Law Laid Down - The scheme of the M.P. Industrial Disputes Rules, 1957 particularly of Rule 10-A and Sub-rule (1) and (2) of Rule 10-B of the said Rules makes it abundantly clear that the notice of the first hearing is not required to be given when the party has already appeared before the Labour Court on the basis of the notice issued by the Court. Sub-rule (3) of Rule 10-B of the said Rules is not mandatory but pertains to matter of procedure and therefore, it Full Judgment