Judgments - Financial
Vishal Tiwari Versus Union of India
Salimbhai Hamidbhai Menon Versus Niteshkumar Maganbhai Patel & Anr.
The High Court of Judicature at Madras Rep. by its Registrar General Versus M.C. Subramaniam & ors.
C. BRIGHT VERSUS THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR & ORS.
M/S. L&T HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED VERSUS M/S. TRISHUL DEVELOPERS AND ANR.
Ramswaroop Singh Gurjar vs. State of MP & Ors.
M/s Kesar Multimodal Logistics Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Others
Law Laid Down - The Reserve Bank of India has issued the circular dated 12.02.2018 in exercise of its statutory functions, therefore, the circular has a statutory force in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court reported as (2002) 1 SCC 367 (Central Bank of India vs. Ravindra and others) and therefore, there cannot be any estopple against a Statute. The decision of the Banks: as to whether the account of the petitioner should be treated under SDR mechanism or the Full Judgment
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Ltd. v/s The Additional District Magistrate & Ors
Manish Makhija Vs. Central Bank of India and others
Law laid down - Section 14(1) of the Securitisation & Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002- satisfaction of Magistrate- not specifically required to be recorded. The satisfaction is regarding adjudicating that nine points of declaration are covered in the affidavit. It does not call for any modicum of enquiry into the veracity or justification or the decision of declaration or any aspect thereof. Even if the word “satisfaction” is not recorded by the Magistrate but his Full Judgment