Judgments
M/S. SRD NUTRIENTS PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE GUWAHATI
Rohit Tandon :Versus: The Enforcement Directorate
Uttarakhand Transport Corporation (Earlier known as U.P.S.R.T.C.) & Ors. Versus Sukhveer Singh
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS VERSUS MAJ. GEN. MANOMOY GANGULY, VSM
National Institute of Medical Science University Rajasthan & Anr. Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors
Kerala Private Hospital Association VERSUS State of Kerala & Ors.
Management of Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. VERSUS M. Mani
SANJAY KUMAR CHOUDHARY Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
SRINIVASRAO UDAMALA Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
THAKUR DAS Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Rajendra Singh Versus Rajendra Singh And State of M.P & Others
Puspraj Singh Baghel Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh & others
Law Laid Down - Sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Madhya Pradesh Motoryan Karadhan Adhiniyam, 1991 raises a statutory presumption that if the certificate of registration is valid, the transport vehicle is presumed to be in use or kept for use. The same cannot be disputed only for the reason that in absence of fitness certificate, the owner of the vehicle is absolved to pay the tax under the said Adhiniyam. Followed: Division Bench judgment dated 03.10.2017 rendered in W.P. No.14557/2017 Full Judgment
MAHARANA PRATAP COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY & RESEARCH CENTRE Vs. THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Ajay Kumar Dohar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - The removal or disqualification of an elected representative has serious repercussion, therefore, elected representative must not be removed unless a clear-cut case is made out. The requirement of furnishing of election expenses is a step to ensure proper maintenance of accounts. Such condition is only a procedure to achieve the said object, thus, not a mandatory condition. The technicality of non-opening of bank account for incurring the election expenses through the bank account cannot be a ground to Full Judgment