Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3962
of 2016, Judgment Date: Feb 13, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 321
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 13, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1778
of 2010, Judgment Date: Feb 13, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
WRIT PETITION, 4143
of 2016, Judgment Date: Feb 13, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 5164
of 2016, Judgment Date: Feb 13, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Special Leave Petition (Civil), 3350
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 13, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 3962
of 2016, Judgment Date: Feb 13, 2017
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
CRA->CRIMINAL APPEAL, 999
of 2004, Judgment Date: Feb 13, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2342
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 10, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Review Petition (Crl.), 712-714
of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 09, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 2368
of 2011, Judgment Date: Feb 09, 2017
It is clear from the above discussion that exercise for determining
‘inadequacy of representation’, ‘backwardness’ and ‘overall efficiency’, is
a must for exercise of power under Article 16(4A). Mere fact that there is
no proportionate representation in promotional posts for the population of
SCs and STs is not by itself enough to grant consequential seniority to
promotees who are otherwise junior and thereby denying seniority to those
who are given Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1792
of 2013, Judgment Date: Feb 09, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
WRIT PETITION, 3975
of 2016, Judgment Date: Feb 09, 2017
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
WPC->WRIT PETITION ALL ORDERS CIVIL [ RELATED TO OTHER MATTER ], 2705
of 2016, Judgment Date: Feb 09, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
WRIT PETITION, 12437
of 2012, Judgment Date: Feb 09, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 260-261
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 08, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Writ Petition (Civil), 328
of 2002, Judgment Date: Feb 08, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
CRA, 1064
of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 08, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 2388
of 2016, Judgment Date: Feb 08, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1546
of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 07, 2017
It is a settled principle of law that while considering the grant of
leave to contest the eviction proceedings under the Rent Laws, the
Authority/Court is not expected to examine the merits and demerits of the
grounds raised in the application for grant of leave to contest and if the
Authority/Court finds that the grounds raised prima facie disclose Full Judgment
