Filter by Date
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Smt. Mamta Rai Vs. State Of U.P. & 8 Others

WRIT - A, 1416 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 08, 2015

Once it has been found that Indra Dev had no right over the property in question, obviously his heirs also had no right, based upon inheritence, to transfer the same. There is no error of jurisdiction or failure of justice in the matter, which may require any interference under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Petition fails and is dismissed. Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

M/s Mile Stone Soft. Tech. Pvt. Ltd. Vs Nidhi Chhibber

CONC->CONTEMPT CASE, 02 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 08, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. SERVO-MED INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI

Appeal (Civil), 583 of 2005, Judgment Date: May 07, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

KHENYEI Vs. NEW INDIA ASSURNACE CO.LTD.& ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4244 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 07, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, KERALA Vs. M/S. TRAVANCORE SUGARS & CHEMICALS LTD.

Appeal (Civil), 2558 of 2005, Judgment Date: May 07, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Ashish Kumar And Another Vs. State Of U.P. And Another

APPLICATION U/s 482, 12482 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 07, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

IQBAL & ANR Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Appeal (Crl.), 1663 of 2012, Judgment Date: May 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF A.P. Vs. P.VENKATESHWARLU

Appeal (Crl.), 1317 of 2008, Judgment Date: May 06, 2015

The demand and acceptance of the amount as illegal gratification is a sine qua non for constituting an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The prosecution is duty bound to establish that there was illegal offer of bribe and acceptance thereof and it has to be founded on facts. The offence under Section 7 of P.C. Act has been confirmed by the Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Vs. KESAVAPATNAM CHINA SWAMY

Appeal (Crl.), 89 of 2009, Judgment Date: May 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

KIRSHNA TEXPORT & CAPITAL MARKETS LTD. Vs. ILA A AGRAWAL & ORS.

Appeal (Crl.), 1220 of 2009, Judgment Date: May 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF U.P. Vs. DAMODAR & ANR.

Appeal (Crl.), 714 of 2009, Judgment Date: May 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

K.S. RAVINDRAN Vs. BRANCH MANAGR,NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD

31909 of 2013, Judgment Date: May 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Vs. CALCUTTA MINERAL SUPPLY CO.P.LTD. & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2548 of 2006, Judgment Date: May 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ZONAL.GEN.MANAGER,IRCON INTER.NATNL.LTD. Vs. M/S VINAY HEAVY EQUIPMENTS

Appeal (Civil), 7205 of 2006, Judgment Date: May 06, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. B.P.L. LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CALICUT

Appeal (Civil), 5523 of 2004, Judgment Date: May 05, 2015

NON-REPORTABLE Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. COAL HANDLERS PVT. LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, KOLKATA

Appeal (Civil), 7215 of 2004, Judgment Date: May 05, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. SECURE METERS LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, NEW DELHI

Appeal (Civil), 7526 of 2004, Judgment Date: May 05, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

K.RADHIKA Vs. T.RAJYA LAXMI & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4201 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 05, 2015

It consists of innumerable errors. We only hope that it is not the desire of the High Court that such candidates are required to be appointed merely because they have the higher grade qualification. We, therefore, allow the appeal and set aside the judgment under appeal. Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Shri Ram Naresh Yadav Versus State of M.P. and others

WRIT PETITION, 3346 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 05, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Smt. Premwati Devi Vs. State Of U.P. & Another

WRIT - A, 1716 of 2015, Judgment Date: May 04, 2015

Having considered the aforesaid submissions, this court finds that the application to withdraw the suit in appeal has been filed under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC, which was rightly held to be not maintainable as there was no compromise between the parties. Even otherwise, the suit has been dismissed on merits and also applications for amendment have been rejected.  Full Judgment

Tags CPC