Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RANBEER SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS. Vs. STATE OF U.P.& ORS

Appeal (Crl.), 205 of 2009, Judgment Date: Mar 27, 2015

The main contention is that when the case of prosecution has been believed and relied upon by the High Court and on that basis the main accused Shyamu is convicted, the present three respondents cannot be acquitted. Therefore, the only question before us is whether, in the given facts and circumstances the case, the role attributed to the present three Accused-respondents lead to Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

UMRALA GRAM PANCHAYAT Vs. THE SEC.MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE UNION & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 3209-3210 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 27, 2015

They have also been working for similar number of hours, however, the discrepancy in the payment of wages/salary between the permanent and the non-permanent workmen is alarming and the same has to be construed as being an unfair labour practice as defined under Section 2(ra) of the ID Act r/w Entry No.10 of the Fifth Schedule to the ID Act, which is prohibited under Section 25(T) of the ID Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ASHA VERMAN & ORS. Vs. MAHARAJ SINGH & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 3211 - 3212 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 27, 2015

On applying the principles as laid down in the case of Sarla Verma (supra), 50% of the salary must be added to the income of the deceased towards future prospects of income, which comes to Rs.6,900/- per month, i.e. Rs.82,800/- per annum. Deducting 1/4th for personal expenses and applying the appropriate multiplier taking into consideration the age of Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DHOLE GOVIND SAHEBRAO & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2485 - 2490 of 2010, Judgment Date: Mar 26, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

VED MITTER GILL Vs. U.T. ADMINISTRATION, CHANDIGARH & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 3194 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 26, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

A. RAGHU, SON OF RAJAIAH Vs. GOVT. OF A.P. & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 5862 of 2007, Judgment Date: Mar 26, 2015

The judgments cited pertain to the particular rule of seniority, which was subject matter of consideration. None of the seniority rules which were taken into consideration is akin to rule 15 which is to be applied for determining the inter se seniority of Sub- Inspectors of Police, in the present case. Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

S. SATYANARAYANA VERSUS ENERGO MASCH POWER ENGINEERING & CONSULTING PVT. LTD. & ORS

Appeal (Crl.), 516 - 518 of 2010, Judgment Date: Mar 26, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF U.P Vs. CHARAN SINGH

Appeal (Civil), 2381 of 2007, Judgment Date: Mar 26, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PVR LIMITED Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 10091 of 2010, Judgment Date: Mar 25, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

DASHMESH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY Vs. PUNJAB URBAN DEVE.AUTHORITY & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4684 - 4685 of 2005, Judgment Date: Mar 25, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MOHAN SINGH GILL & ORS. ETC. ETC. Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. ETC. ETC.

Appeal (Civil), 3177 - 3178 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 25, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR. Vs. GOODRICKE GROUP LTD. & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 9043 of 2003, Judgment Date: Mar 25, 2015

Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Smt. Durga Bajaj, wife of Shri Deepak Bajaj, aged about 37 years, resident of Main Road, Korba, Police Station and District-Korba, (CG) Vs State of Chhattisgarh, Through- The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, (CG)

ACQA->ACQUITTAL APPEAL [ APPEAL U/S 378 ], 1196 of 2014 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 25, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SHREYA SINGHAL VERSUS UNION OF INDIA

Writ Petition (Crl.), 167 of 2012, Judgment Date: Mar 24, 2015

This batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raises very important and far-reaching questions relatable primarily to the fundamental right of free speech and expression guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The immediate cause for concern in these petitions is Section 66A of the Information Technology Act of 2000. 119. Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MANMEET SINGH ALIAS GOLDIE Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB

Appeal (Crl.), 505 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

D.D.A. Vs. GAURAV KUKREJA

Appeal (Civil), 3124 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF MP Vs. NOMI SINGH & ANR

Appeal (Civil), 3050 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF H P AND ORS Vs. PUNRA DEVI

Appeal (Civil), 34795 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

COMMNR. OF INCOME TAX, GAUHATI & ORS. Vs. M/S. SATI OIL UDYOG LTD. & ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 9133 - 9134 of 2003, Judgment Date: Mar 24, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S MILLENNIUM WIRES P LTD Vs. STATE TRADING CORP. OF INDIA LTD & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 3103 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 23, 2015

It would suffice to say here that injunctions against the negotiating banks for making payments to the beneficiary must be given cautiously as constant judicial interference in the normal practices of market can have disastrous consequences as it affects the trustworthiness of the Indian banks and markets. In the circumstances as narrated above and in light of the settled law on the point of injunction against the banks to honour their Full Judgment