Judgments - Abetment
SHATRUGHNA ATMARAM PATIL VERSUS VINOD DODHU CHAUDHARY
Mohit Singhal v. The State of Uttarakhand
SHAMBHUBHAI KALABHAI RAVAL VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT
Rajendra Singh Lodhi Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Ashok Rawat Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh
MARIANO ANTO BRUNO & ANR. VERSUS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
DAXABEN Versus THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
Lalit Dubey versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh
DHEERAJ BHADVIYA VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VERSUS JOGENDRA & ANR.
Meera Versus State By the Inspector of Police Thiruvotriyur Police Station Chennai
Mahendra K C Versus The State of Karnataka & Anr.
GEO VARGHESE VERSUS THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
Velladurai Versus State represented by the Inspector of Police
GUMANSINH @ LALO @ RAJU BHIKHABHAI CHAUHAN & ANR. VERSUS THE STATE OF GUJARAT
(1) Smt. Guddi Rawat (2) Virendra Rawat Versus State of MP
Law laid down - (1) As Section 306 of IPC makes abatement of commission of suicide punishable, therefore, for making a person liable for an offence punishable under Section 306 IPC, it is a duty of the prosecution to establish that such person has abated the commission of suicide and for the purpose of determining the act of the accused it is necessary to see that his act must fall in any of the 3 categories as enumerated under Section 107 of Full Judgment
SATBIR SINGH & ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA
Shivcharan Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law Laid down:- Abetment of an offence, falls under the category of “Inchoate Offences” – Characteristics of an Inchoate Offence – When can an accused be held guilty of having abetted an offence – assessing the guilt of an accused in abetment of suicide by wife from domestic violence/matrimonial cruelty. Full Judgment