Judgments - Abetment
Liyakatuddin Versus State of M.P
Vaijnath Kondiba Khandke Versus State of Maharashtra and Another
EKNATH S/O. VITHALRAO SHINDE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
SANJAY S/O BHIMRAO DAHAKE Vs THE STATE OF MAH.THR.PSO.CHANDRAPUR
KANPAI HAZARIKA @ HEMANTA HAZARIKA VS THE STATE OF ASSAM
Rakesh Gupta Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Yanesh @ Yogesh Kumar Sahu Versus State Of Chhattisgarh
RAVINDRA BHIMRAO KHILLARE. Vs 1. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
SHESHRAO WASUDEO DANGE Vs THE STATE OF MAH. THR. ITS PSO PSO AKOLA
STATE OF MAH.THR. PSO AMRAVATI Vs RAJENDRA KASHIRAO BHUJADE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs RAMESH DAMODAR MORE & ANR.
STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs SELVI J. JAYALALITHA & ORS.
GURCHARAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
There is thus neither any proximate nor remote acts of omission or commission on the part of the appellant and his family members that can be irrefutably construed to be a direct or indirect cause or factor compelling Surjit and her daughters to take the extreme step of self-elimination. It is thus manifest that the offence punishable is one of abetment of the commission of suicide by any person, predicating existence of a Full Judgment
SOMASUNDARAM @ SOMU Vs. STATE REP.BY DY.COMM.OF POLICE
…For the present, it may be sufficient to state that the gist of the offence of criminal conspiracy created under Section 120-A is a bare agreement to commit an offence. It has been made punishable under Section 120-B. The offence of abetment created under the second clause of Section 107 requires that there must be something more than a Full Judgment
R.RACHAIAH Vs. HOME SECRETARY, BANGALORE
The bare reading of Section 216 reveals that though it is permissible for any Court to alter or add to any charge at any time before judgment is pronounced, certain safeguards, looking into the interest of the accused person who is charged with the additional charge or with the alteration of the additional charge, are also provided specifically under sub-sections (3) and 4 of Section 216 of the Code. Sub-section(3), in no Full Judgment
BHANUBEN AND ANR Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
Merely because an accused has been held liable to be punished under Section 498A IPC, it does not follow that on the same evidence, he must also and necessarily be held guilty of having abetted the commission of suicide by the women concerned under 306 IPC. Therefore, the conviction and sentence for offence punishable under Section 306 read with Section 114 of the Full Judgment