Judgments - Abetment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Kantilal Versus The State of Gujarat
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
UDE SINGH & ORS VS STATE OF HARYANA
Tags Abetment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
GIRISH SINGH VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
JAGDISHRAJ KHATTA VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
NARAYAN MALHARI THORAT VERSUS VINAYAK DEORAO BHAGAT AND ANR
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA & ORS Vs. STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
Tags Abetment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
Liyakatuddin Versus State of M.P
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Vaijnath Kondiba Khandke Versus State of Maharashtra and Another
Tags Abetment
Bombay High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
EKNATH S/O. VITHALRAO SHINDE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
Tags Abetment
Bombay High Court (Single Judge)
SANJAY S/O BHIMRAO DAHAKE Vs THE STATE OF MAH.THR.PSO.CHANDRAPUR
Tags Abetment
Gauhati High Court (Single Judge)
KANPAI HAZARIKA @ HEMANTA HAZARIKA VS THE STATE OF ASSAM
Tags Abetment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
Rakesh Gupta Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Tags Abetment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
Yanesh @ Yogesh Kumar Sahu Versus State Of Chhattisgarh
Tags Abetment
Bombay High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
RAVINDRA BHIMRAO KHILLARE. Vs 1. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Tags Abetment
Bombay High Court (Single Judge)
SHESHRAO WASUDEO DANGE Vs THE STATE OF MAH. THR. ITS PSO PSO AKOLA
Bombay High Court (Single Judge)
STATE OF MAH.THR. PSO AMRAVATI Vs RAJENDRA KASHIRAO BHUJADE
Bombay High Court (Single Judge)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs RAMESH DAMODAR MORE & ANR.
Tags Abetment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
STATE OF KARNATAKA Vs SELVI J. JAYALALITHA & ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
GURCHARAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF PUNJAB
There is thus neither any proximate nor remote acts of omission or commission on the part of the appellant and his family members that can be irrefutably construed to be a direct or indirect cause or factor compelling Surjit and her daughters to take the extreme step of self-elimination. It is thus manifest that the offence punishable is one of abetment of the commission of suicide by any person, predicating existence of a Full Judgment