Judgments - Arbitration
RAJESH VERMA Vs. ASHWANI KUMAR KHANNA
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Vs. M/S JSC CENTRODOSTROY
It has consistently been laid down by this Court that construction of the terms of a Contract is primarily for an Arbitrator or Arbitral Tribunal to decide and unless the Arbitrator or Arbitral Tribunal construes the contract in such a way that no fair minded or reasonable person could do, no interference by Court is called for. Viewed Full Judgment
M/s. Chandra Nirman Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Orient Paper Mills Ltd
PURPLE INDI HOLDINGS LTD. Vs. DRILLING &OFFSHORE PTE. LTD,
M/s Lal Babu Singh, Through - Partner Vinod Kumar Singh V/s . State of Chhattisgarh
UNION OF INDIA Vs. M/S AMBIKA CONSTRUCION
The issue involved in the reference is in regard to the power of the Arbitrator to award pendente lite interest when contract contains bar for grant of interest in a case covered by the Arbitration Act, 1940 Thus, our answer to the reference is that if contract expressly bars award of interest pendente lite, the same cannot be awarded by the Arbitrator. We also make Full Judgment
AXON CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. Vs. OM ASTHA CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. AND ORS
RAJENDRA KUMAR TEKRIWAL Vs. M/S UNIQUE CONSTRN.P.LTD.& ORS.
RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD. Vs. M/S. PRATHYUSHA RESOURCES & INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
SUNAGRO SEEDS PVT LTD V/s NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LTD
M/S COCHIN SHIPYARD LTD Vs. M/S APEEJAY SHIPPING LTD
Misconduct, as has been laid down, does not always have a moral connotation. To elaborate, it may not have any connection with the individual/personal conduct of the arbitrator. The said conduct would be in sphere of moral misconduct. As far as legal misconduct is concerned, as the authorities would demonstrate, the same must be manifest or palpable from the proceedings before the arbitrator. To Full Judgment