Judgments - Arbitration
M/s Lal Babu Singh, Through - Partner Vinod Kumar Singh V/s . State of Chhattisgarh
UNION OF INDIA Vs. M/S AMBIKA CONSTRUCION
The issue involved in the reference is in regard to the power of the Arbitrator to award pendente lite interest when contract contains bar for grant of interest in a case covered by the Arbitration Act, 1940 Thus, our answer to the reference is that if contract expressly bars award of interest pendente lite, the same cannot be awarded by the Arbitrator. We also make Full Judgment
AXON CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. Vs. OM ASTHA CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. AND ORS
RAJENDRA KUMAR TEKRIWAL Vs. M/S UNIQUE CONSTRN.P.LTD.& ORS.
RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD. Vs. M/S. PRATHYUSHA RESOURCES & INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.
SUNAGRO SEEDS PVT LTD V/s NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LTD
M/S COCHIN SHIPYARD LTD Vs. M/S APEEJAY SHIPPING LTD
Misconduct, as has been laid down, does not always have a moral connotation. To elaborate, it may not have any connection with the individual/personal conduct of the arbitrator. The said conduct would be in sphere of moral misconduct. As far as legal misconduct is concerned, as the authorities would demonstrate, the same must be manifest or palpable from the proceedings before the arbitrator. To Full Judgment
SHAILESH DHAIRYAWAN Vs. MOHAN BALKRISHNA LULLA
M/S ARN INFRASTRUCTURE INDIA PVT LTD. Vs AVATAR SINGH GILL (HUF)
NEXGEN EDUSOLUTIONS PVT LTD. Vs ASPIRE INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD.
M/S BUNDELA BANDHU CONSTRUCTION CO Vs NATIONAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD
UNION OF INDIA Vs. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND ORS.
Smt. Meena Shrivastava Vs Union of India & others.
TAIYO MEMBRANCE CORP.P.LTD. Vs. SHAPOORJI PALLONJI & CO.LTD.
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. Vs. STERLITE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. M/S. BANDEEP SINGH & ORS
INDIAN RARE EARTHS LTD. Vs. UNIQUE BUILDERS LTD.
ROHM AND HAAS ELECTRONIC MATERIALS HOLDING UK LIMITED AND ANR Vs R.B. BUSINESS PROMOTIONS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.
LAKHBIR SINGH Vs ARUN KHANNA
UNION OF INDIA Vs. M/S BRIGHT POWER PROJECTS(I) P.LTD.
When parties to the contract had agreed to the fact that interest would not be awarded on the amount payable to the contractor under the contract, in our opinion, they were bound by their understanding. Having once agreed that the contractor would not claim Full Judgment