Judgments - Arbitration
SUNAGRO SEEDS PVT LTD V/s NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LTD
M/S COCHIN SHIPYARD LTD Vs. M/S APEEJAY SHIPPING LTD
Misconduct, as has been laid down, does not always have a moral connotation. To elaborate, it may not have any connection with the individual/personal conduct of the arbitrator. The said conduct would be in sphere of moral misconduct. As far as legal misconduct is concerned, as the authorities would demonstrate, the same must be manifest or palpable from the proceedings before the arbitrator. To Full Judgment
SHAILESH DHAIRYAWAN Vs. MOHAN BALKRISHNA LULLA
M/S ARN INFRASTRUCTURE INDIA PVT LTD. Vs AVATAR SINGH GILL (HUF)
NEXGEN EDUSOLUTIONS PVT LTD. Vs ASPIRE INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD.
M/S BUNDELA BANDHU CONSTRUCTION CO Vs NATIONAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD
UNION OF INDIA Vs. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND ORS.
Smt. Meena Shrivastava Vs Union of India & others.
TAIYO MEMBRANCE CORP.P.LTD. Vs. SHAPOORJI PALLONJI & CO.LTD.
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. Vs. STERLITE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. M/S. BANDEEP SINGH & ORS
INDIAN RARE EARTHS LTD. Vs. UNIQUE BUILDERS LTD.
ROHM AND HAAS ELECTRONIC MATERIALS HOLDING UK LIMITED AND ANR Vs R.B. BUSINESS PROMOTIONS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.
LAKHBIR SINGH Vs ARUN KHANNA
UNION OF INDIA Vs. M/S BRIGHT POWER PROJECTS(I) P.LTD.
When parties to the contract had agreed to the fact that interest would not be awarded on the amount payable to the contractor under the contract, in our opinion, they were bound by their understanding. Having once agreed that the contractor would not claim Full Judgment
M/S.ESSAR OIL LTD. Vs. HINDUSTAN SHIPYARD LTD. & ORS.
M/S SUPREMA INC Vs. 4G INDENTITY SOLUTIONS PVT LTD
ASHAPURA MINE-CHEM LTD Vs. GUJARAT MINERAL DEVLOPMENT CORPORATION
In the light of our above conclusion, we hold that the learned Judge having failed to appreciate the legal position as regards the existence of an arbitration agreement in the MoU irrespective of the failure of the parties to reach a full-fledged agreement with respect to the various terms and conditions contained in the MoU for a joint venture, the said conclusion and judgment of the learned Full Judgment
M/S BHANDARI UDYOG LTD Vs. INDUSTRIAL FACILITATION COUNCIL & ANR
The short question that falls for consideration in this appeal is as to whether the Bombay High Court has correctly decided the jurisdiction of a Court to entertain application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996? Indisputably, the Arbitration proceeding has been conducted within the jurisdiction of Raichur court, which has jurisdiction as per Section 20 of the Code of Civil Procedure and is Full Judgment
M/S SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED AND ANR. Vs. T. THANKAM
Once an application is duly filed in terms of Section 8 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'Arbitration Act') before the civil court, what should be the approach of the court, is the short question arising for consideration in this case. Once there is an agreement between the parties to refer the disputes or differences arising out of the agreement to arbitration, and in case Full Judgment