Judgments - Arbitration
M/S. EMM ENN ASSOCIATES Vs. COMMANDER WORKS ENGINEER & ORS.- Arbitration
Faisal Mohammad Khan versus Harisingh Saini. Dated - 2016-06-20
Union Of India Versus M/S K.C. Sharma. Dated - 16.06.2016
MR. MUKESH SHARMA V/s MR. ROGER SHASHOUA & ORS. EF+
M/S FOODWORLD V/s INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING & TOURISM CORPORATION LTD (IRCTC)
VASAN HEALTH CARE PVT LTD THR DIRECTORS V/s GE CAPITAL SERVICES INDIA THR AUTHORIED REPRESENTATIVE
EITZEN BULK A/S Vs. ASHAPURA MINECHEM LIMITED & ANR
M.C.MEHTA Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
M/S GANGOTRI ENTERPRISES LTD. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
M/S SHINHAN APEX CORPORATION Vs. M/S EURO APEX B.V
MESSER HOLDINGS LTD. Vs. SHYAM MADANMOHAN RUIA & ORS
RAJESH VERMA Vs. ASHWANI KUMAR KHANNA
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Vs. M/S JSC CENTRODOSTROY
It has consistently been laid down by this Court that construction of the terms of a Contract is primarily for an Arbitrator or Arbitral Tribunal to decide and unless the Arbitrator or Arbitral Tribunal construes the contract in such a way that no fair minded or reasonable person could do, no interference by Court is called for. Viewed Full Judgment
M/s. Chandra Nirman Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Orient Paper Mills Ltd
PURPLE INDI HOLDINGS LTD. Vs. DRILLING &OFFSHORE PTE. LTD,
M/s Lal Babu Singh, Through - Partner Vinod Kumar Singh V/s . State of Chhattisgarh
UNION OF INDIA Vs. M/S AMBIKA CONSTRUCION
The issue involved in the reference is in regard to the power of the Arbitrator to award pendente lite interest when contract contains bar for grant of interest in a case covered by the Arbitration Act, 1940 Thus, our answer to the reference is that if contract expressly bars award of interest pendente lite, the same cannot be awarded by the Arbitrator. We also make Full Judgment
