Judgments - Award
M/S SHRIRAM EPC LIMITED VERSUS RIOGLASS SOLAR SA
Jehangir D. Mehta Vs. The Real Nayak Sakh Sahkari Maryadit and Another
Law laid down - The order or decision of the arbitration council under Section 57 of the Madhya Pradesh Swayatta Sahakarita Adhiniyam, 1999 is an arbitration award and it is not a decree passed by the civil court as defined under Section 2(2) of the CPC, hence the stamp duty as required by the Schedule 1A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1889 is payable for its execution. Full Judgment
VENTURE GLOBAL ENGINEERING LLC VERSUS TECH MAHINDRA LTD & ANR ETC
NARENDRA & ORS. VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
Bharvagi Constructions & Anr. VERSUS Kothakapu Muthyam Reddy & Ors.
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Vs. RAM AVTAR
DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. Vs. DELHI AIRPORT METRO EXPRESS PRIVATE LIMITED
IFFCO-Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Imarti Bai & Ors.
Sardarsingh Vs. Smt. Chainkunwar
CENTRAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INST.&ANR. Vs. PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT & ORS.
M/S. HARISH CHANDRA & COMPANY Vs. STATE OF U.P. THR. SUPERINTENDING ENG
M/S JAYASWALS NECO LTD Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
Water Resources Department Engineer versus Shri Manharan
NHPC LTD Vs. M/S JAI PRAKASH ASSOCIATES LTD.
Union Of India Versus M/S K.C. Sharma. Dated - 16.06.2016
MR. MUKESH SHARMA V/s MR. ROGER SHASHOUA & ORS. EF+
EITZEN BULK A/S Vs. ASHAPURA MINECHEM LIMITED & ANR
M/S SHINHAN APEX CORPORATION Vs. M/S EURO APEX B.V
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Vs. M/S JSC CENTRODOSTROY
It has consistently been laid down by this Court that construction of the terms of a Contract is primarily for an Arbitrator or Arbitral Tribunal to decide and unless the Arbitrator or Arbitral Tribunal construes the contract in such a way that no fair minded or reasonable person could do, no interference by Court is called for. Viewed Full Judgment