Judgments - Bail
BIMAL KUMAR JAIN and NARESH JAIN VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
Gopal Krishna Gautam alias Pandit Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.
Law laid down:- 1. Sections 35, 54 and 66 under NDPS Act raise presumptions (which are rebuttable) over accused to prove his innocence, although the standard of proof required for the accused to prove his innocence is Preponderance of Probability which accused shall have to establish. NDPS Act carries reverse burden of proof under Sections 35 and 54. Noor Aga Vs. State of Punjab, (2008) 16 SCC 417 relied. 2. An initial burden exists upon the prosecution and when it stands satisfied, Full Judgment
Somesh Chaurasia Versus State of M.P. & Anr. - 22/07/2021
KUMER SINGH Versus STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
Mamta Nair Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr.
Nandkishore s/o Ganesh Ram Meghwal Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - In case of issuance of summons/warrants against government employee/officer, the prosecution fails to procure their presence in Court, their salary/pension, as the case may be, can be withheld, if it is found that the government official is avoiding the summons/warrants. Full Judgment
Vijay Baid and Ors Versus Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
DHARMESH @ DHARMENDRA @ DHAMO JAGDISHBHAI @ JAGABHAI BHAGUBHAI RATADIA & ANR. Versus THE STATE OF GUJARAT
ARVIND YADAV IN JC THROUGH HIS PAIROKAR VERSUS GOVT OF NCT DELHI THROUGH STANDING COUSNEL
SUBHASH VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Sunil Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Hirdesh Sahu s/o Jagdish Sahu Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - The examination of the witness shall be held as expeditiously as possible; and the same shall be continued on day to day basis till its conclusion. The Judge ought to have seen the sensitivity of the matter and should not have given such long date for the purposes of cross[1]examination which has led to the material witness turning hostile, seriously jeopardizing and undermining the efforts made by the police officers to bring home the charges against the accused Full Judgment