Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 1812
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 16, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 1290
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 16, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 1516
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 16, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.M.C., 612
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 16, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 1563
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 12, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 28
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 09, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 3422
of 2020, Judgment Date: Aug 09, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 348
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 09, 2021
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 38747
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 09, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 2293
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 05, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 1575
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2021
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC, 29708
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2021
Law laid down -
1. It is held that, in majority of the cases of rape, the defence of the accused is that the prosecutrix was a consenting party and in most of the cases the accused gets the benefit of doubt also, but in the considered opinion of this Court, barring some exceptions, India are a conservative society, it has not yet reached such level (advance or lower) of civilization where unmarried girls, regardless of their religion, indulge in carnal Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 2322
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 02, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 112
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 30, 2021
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MISC. CRL, 31747
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 28, 2021
Law laid down:-
1. Sections 35, 54 and 66 under NDPS Act raise presumptions (which are rebuttable) over accused to prove his innocence, although the standard of proof required for the accused to prove his innocence is Preponderance of Probability which accused shall have to establish. NDPS Act carries reverse burden of proof under Sections 35 and 54. Noor Aga Vs. State of Punjab, (2008) 16 SCC 417 relied.
2. An initial burden exists upon the prosecution and when it stands satisfied, Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 2702
of 2020, Judgment Date: Jul 27, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 1520
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 22, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 590-591
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 22, 2021
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 571
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 20, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 1801
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 16, 2021
Full Judgment
