Judgments - Charge
Manish Kumar Thakur Vs. State of M.P. & Others
Subhash Chandra Sharma & Ors. v. State of M.P. & Ano.
R.RACHAIAH Vs. HOME SECRETARY, BANGALORE
The bare reading of Section 216 reveals that though it is permissible for any Court to alter or add to any charge at any time before judgment is pronounced, certain safeguards, looking into the interest of the accused person who is charged with the additional charge or with the alteration of the additional charge, are also provided specifically under sub-sections (3) and 4 of Section 216 of the Code. Sub-section(3), in no Full Judgment
Dilip Kumar Das Vs Central Bureau of Investigation (ACB), Chhattisgarh, Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G.), Civil & Revenue Distt. Durg (C.G.)
Sonu Gupta Versus Deepak Gupta & Ors.
-At the stage of cognizance and summoning the Magistrate is required to apply his judicial mind only with a view to take cognizance of the offence, or, in other words, to find out whether prima facie case has been made out for summoning the accused persons. At this stage, the learned Magistrate is not required to consider the defence version or materials or Full Judgment
Vishwanath Sahu and others Vs State of Chhattisgarh
Even strong suspicion founded on the material on record, to form a presumptive opinion constituting the offence alleged, would justify framing of charge Full Judgment
- 1
- 2
- Next
- Last