Judgments - Civil Procedure
STATE OF KERALA & ORS. Vs. M/S KERALA RARE EARTH & MINERALS LIMITED & ORS
MANISH KUMAR SUREKA Vs. WEST BENGAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND ORS.
C.M.D. (EZ) MPPKVVCL & another Vs. Sharad Oshwal
STATE OF ORISSA & ANR. Vs. ABANI BALLAV DEY & ORS
ESTATE OFFICER, U.T. CHANDIGARH & ORS. Vs. RAJAN SOI & ORS.
INDORE MUNICIPAL CORPN & ANR. Vs. HARISH TOLANI
RAM RATI Vs. MANGE RAM (D) THR LRS. & ORS.
INDIAN BANK Vs. M/S NIPPON ENTERPRISES SOUTH & ORS
Smt. Kanchan Khattar Vs. Rakesh Dardwanshi and others
DAMODAR LAL Vs. SOHAN DEVI AND ORS
RAMAKANT DWIVEDI Vs. RAFIQ AHMAD AND ORS.
SHREYA VIDYARTHI Vs. ASHOK VIDYARTHI & ORS.
CALCUTTA STOCK EXCHANGE Vs. M/S BLB LIMITED
A. ANDISAMY CHETTIAR Vs. A. SUBBURAJ CHETTIAR
State of Chhattisgarh and another V/s Chandra Bhan Singh and others
STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Vs. UNITED BANK OF INDIA
The doctrine of legitimate expectation ordinarily would not have any application when the legislature has enacted a statute. The legitimate expectation should be legitimate, reasonable and valid. For the application of doctrine of legitimate expectation, any representation or promise should be made by an authority. A person unconnected with the authority, who had Full Judgment
M/S. STATE BANK OF PATIALA TR.GEN.MANAGER Vs. COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA
GURUDASSING NAWOOSINGH PANJWANI Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
Veerendra Kumar Vs Additional District Judge,Sultanpur and others
SANT RAM Vs. DHAN KAUR & ORS.
It is a settled principle of law that only those issues could be given up by the party which are the subject matter of the lis before the Court. Since in the petition before this Court, the issue with regard to award of mesne profits at the rate of 30/- p.m. was not the subject matter at the instance of any party to the lis, the question of Full Judgment